No, he used a humor-tinged analogy to make a point with truth in it metaphorically applicable to this NPOCP, and you’re too faux woke (or not smart enough) to get it and laugh. I remember just three or so years ago when everyone still had a sense of humor, and on this site specifically you could make such jokes…

But that’s the thing: he didn’t imply trans is bad. He implied that pursuing his sexual focus and then finding out someone was not what he thought was bad. That doesn’t imply trans is bad; that implies finding someone is something different than you expected might be bad.

No. That is from 10 years ago. Jalopnik doesn’t have the rights to the actual photos.

That’s a good thing.

A manual CT5-V?

About the same as a healthy adult dying from corona virus

...these are found with just a bit more miles for like half the price.

Is a problem when the adjective “quantitatively” is used in the title and then the article is pretty much all conjecture

Because this isn’t facebook? I realize Jalopnik isn’t MotorTrend or the L.A. Times, but I expect better. Otherwise what’s the point in visiting the website? I can read rants with no citations on FB, or on youtube comments or some other cesspool of misinformation anytime.

Regardless if whether any of us agree or disagree with his opinion, Bubba is correct that this is a very poorly (non-existently) cited article. It reads as more of a rant or opinion piece. And throwing ad hominem insults about him (Bubba) and his choice of cars is lazy and a poor excuse for debate.

I read it perfectly fine. The only paragraph in which you provide anything resembling numbers gets caught, as I said, in the “correlation does not equal causation” trap.

“For one, they’re aerodynamically inefficient. If you opt for the largest wheel on a Tesla Model X, your range is reduced by about 10%. This is true…

Or are they devoted because there has been nothing to compete with the Wrangler? I think a lot of people will want something to differentiate themselves from all the billions of wranglers floating around these days.

But then how, exactly, is one supposed to: “radiate more openness and clarity”. 

THANK YOU. The whole point of a logo is it’s a consistent factor for me to associate your brand with. Changing it up for no particular reason does the exact opposite of its intended purpose.

I don’t get why logos are “due for updates” anyway. Unless there’s a fundamental shift in the business that muddles the logo’s message or they used some very period-specific styling in the first place, there’s no need to change something that currently works. It only makes sense when there’s a functional issue to be…

If this were a manual, I would be in. Those wheels gotta go, though.

The only problem is that it’s priced above the market. You can buy the same example with the more traditional, and honestly better looking, wheels for about $5K less.

You’re not buying a mid 80s aircooled Porsche because you want a Boxster or a Cayman.

I laugh but I’m also wondering what the difference is between a Traverse and an Explorer that makes the Traverse the subject of ridicule? Or is that just a general anti-SUV stance manifesting itself in its GM form by the writer?