Yes, because one story that was never intended to be in ANY continuity trumps 60 years of stories....

Yes, for the first couple issues, decades ago. And then that aspect was abandoned and we have 60 years of the established character.

I can see them being useful for extreme circumstances. But basing whole levels around blowing shit up just seems so un-Batman-y (hows that for a made-up-word).

Yeah..... I know.... that exactly why I said those who make this defense probably "have no exposure to the character beyond the films."

Riiiiight. But that's a constant and integral part of the character, and not something tacked on.... Do try and think things through first.

Because he's not elderly... and this isn't a documentary. There are only tanks there because they decided to put them there.

Yes, the non-canon story about a Batman too old to physically fight adequately. Same thing as adding drone tanks to blow up.

Oh, yes, Im familiar with Dark Knight returns. Im just used to the acronym being used for Rises.

I'd like to play the BatMobile. I'm not interested in a tank.

Id be happier with a genuine BatModile, not a friggin tank. I hope its use is minimal.

"but then Rocksteady would be lying. "

Apparently, since he addresses it.

You know the movies are not the sum total of the character's existence, right?

Yep.

I have a feeling those who make such comments are either very young, or have no exposure to the character beyond the films.

Certainly the worst of the three.

Id rather a Batman game that actually respects the character. I can blow shit up in other games.

I want to play Batman, not tanks.

Yeah, cuz the imaginary character made that choice.... not a company.

And is still a better man than a douche taking potshots from behind his keyboard.