stixxandstones
stixxandstones
stixxandstones

So. Much. This.

Yeah i understand compensating for those affiliate programs. Those are actually tied to you buying X product/service, and using the specific code. The code is mainly for Amazon/Wealthfront to track how many people/sales Radiolab claims it can generate, in order to adjust their ad rates for future years. Them runnign

Really? That’s pretty generous, considering Amazon IS a lot of people’s default shopping site, regardless of what landed them on the website in the first place.

I can’t wait for this election to be over and this liberal thought policing will start dying a slow death. We preach open-mindedness and inclusivity, but the second someone open disagrees with the DNC, it’s out with the pitchforks, or calls for them to be boycotted. It’s tantamount to a new age McCarthyism. It’s a

That might be true for every side project (and follow up redundant app they eventually make- GMail/Inbox, Hangout/Allo/Duo, Youtube/Youtube Pro, Android-then Chromebook kept separate, then jk we’re merging them anyways etc.), but they have never ever half-assed Search. That’s their bread and butter. If anything,

Yeah this is a stupid article. The things it does do, in comparison to these senseless requests, are exponentially more useful and surprisingly intelligent, than “find me cookies”. It’s 2016, AI should compute crazy travel logistics, and track complex inquiries, how bout you find your own damn cookies.

you don’t even have to lie that it’s damaged. They accept all returns even if you say you don’t want it anymore.

you don’t even have to lie that it’s damaged. They accept all returns even if you say you don’t want it anymore.

This is a big shame, what they’re doing is Racketeering- plain and simple. It was fine when “Acceptable Ads” was optional (or is that plain AdBlock?) either way they shouldn’t be profiting of this. You can’t be THE gatekeeper, and then turn around and start shaking publishers down for a fee to let their ads through.

I’m all for companies making money

Exactly. Not understanding the difference btw financial liability, as in an ongoing suit with the past owner as the defendant, vs legal liability, as fear of a FUTURE lawsuit, insert CENSORSHIP Screed here, is why there are so many butthurt articles/comments about this. Just fucking read, people.

Right. they made a rightful business decision to stop hosting content that is in the middle of litigation, that is someone else’s liability.

I love the ad hominem defense against Thiel. Yeah this really shitty thing we did against this guy is totally justified because of all these other terrible things he did 4 years later/shameful political views he holds, neither of which we brought up at the time we did this shitty thing or are even related to this

he’d be replaced on Monday. they’re ruthless in Seattle

The LG g5 has dual cameras, they mainly use it for wider angle photos.

and/or before they build another 2 apps with the exact same functionality. It’s beyond Dilbert-level redundancy over there.

I always thought the appeal of this was broadening your cooking repertoire, cos everyone gets into tired patterns. I wanted to try it for a month, at least find new recipes and cancel the service. I had no idea they actually put their recipes online FOR FREE??

You’re either being deliberately obtuse or you just don’t want to accept that there’s no meat to these claims. Making donations and getting sit-downs doesn’t mean squat, cos again, from this same article, the kinds of people/group that donate to intl. foundations like CF, are also the same people that would typically

The basis of your NPR article, which you clearly didn’t read, said the State Dept./Clinton Foundation conflict of Interest claims are nothing but smoke and mirrors. Every time someone from CF approached about a favor, they were either shut down or asked to go thru official channels. how is that not clear enough for

Lol I’m pretty it wasn’t $1.5M for ONE event. Still not a conflict of interest. And if the fact that Bill Clinton or any other past President charges upwards of 200K to speak is news to you, then you actually lack the cognitive faculty to fully appreciate the political climate of this country, is probably why you go

That is a ridiculously false statement