Did you get me the right link? That one goes to an article about the GM recall. And I think I may have a misunderstanding. Is someone attempting to label misogyny as a mental illness in it's own right, or are they saying that people who express misogynistic views have some form of mental illness? The later is what I…

They aren't mutually exclusive, but one doesn't excuse the other.

Yet both of these limitations don't stand in the way of people chasing their dreams or overcoming them to accomplish life goals. Short people play basketball and tall people can own small cars. Not being comfortable with other people, or finding it hard to make an emotional connection is not a genetic predisposition.…

And that version of what you're describing is fine You don't HAVE to be in a relationship to be happy or fulfilled. You don't need an SO to fill something inside you that you might feel is missing. Not everyone needs that and more power to you for facing life head on with your eyes open. However that doesn't give you…

What? By that question alone you either think I'm a horrible person, or you're someone I really don't want to talk to. Either way I'm not answering that.

Wow, that's not a world I want to live in. Anyone can make the decision that a romantic relationship with another person isn't for them, but arbitrarily declaring that there's a portion of the population that have been prescreened/destined for that isn't really something I want to personally decide or have anyone ever…

Well who's going to do that and answer no? A genuinely good person is going to think they do, but then so is an entitled asshole. The only people who might think they don't are those dealing with depression and self worth issues.

Thank you for posting this. I happen to be in between relationships right now, in a bit of a low point, and it's really easy to feel that "nice guy" creeping in from just outside my peripheral vision. You have to keep on it, keep reminding yourself that, no you don't just get to be in a relationship. You have to work…

Mrs. Kang is a lucky woman.

When 'everything' is incorporated, yeah absolutely. When a character blithely name drops someone or references an event that happened elsewhere as a nod to fans, it is fine, so long as it's not of immediate import to the understanding of what is happening now. Referring to a current event as potentially being as bad…

Thanks for heading the internet fury off at the pass, you sir are a hero.

Very true. You had to be very fucking creative to play a good lunatic. Probably the most inventive example I've ever heard is this one chick who would interact with any character based on her first impression of that person no matter what interactions they might have in the interceding period of time. That could lead…

Well Halo 1 was fine because it was a clear cut story of 'you are fighting these bad guys, the fight unleashed a bigger problem, solve for the larger problem without unleashing an even bigger problem.' It was a VERY simple story and the mysterious precursor elements you don't know much about are fine as they are.

"awkwardly inserted into the game with no real introduction for those unfamiliar with the novels and expanded lore of the game."

AS IS RIGHT AND JUST.

No one is so straight that they can't appreciate well muscled nice smelling dudes. Except maybe homophobes but fuck them.

Wrong guy. There were two different super attractive muscly black guys in those commercials. One was Terry Crews, the other was the guy on the horse.

Year/Product: Roughly 2012 Old Spice Deodorant

I honestly have no idea how to respond to any of that.

Way ahead of you smug dude on the internet!