Could someone explain to me what this article is about? I know precisely zero transgendered women and am completely lost. Any way it could be spelled out in wooden blocks with letters on them?

How can we apply this to daily life?
Perhaps the coloquial 'dipping your balls in it' is more legitimate than we were first lead to believe!

That's bullshit. I have that name because I am a goddamned majestic stallion, just like Zeus was sometimes a bull, and sometimes a swan because chicks go fuckin CRAZY for a sharp dressed swan. GAZE UPON MY TRUE FORM AND KNOW UNIMAGINABLE ECSTASY BEFORE MY DIVINE WIFE SHOWS UP AND CAUSES YOU ALL MANNER OF HELL FOR THE…

That's a good point. I've grown up hearing about what selfish pork faces guys are who don't want to go down on a girl that to run into someone who didn't want it came as something of a shock. Even still I really didn't think when I made that post and I am sorry I phrased myself the way I did. It was pretty insensitive…

Another good point, thank you!

I appreciate it. It's a good explanation too.

I think most people have a pretty limited set of experience and we all collectively pool it together. It's good you can articulate your reasons for not wanting to do something in bed. Know thyself and all that.

Yeah I deserve that. Thank you.

I can see that, and I wouldn't be surprised to discover that a lot of us are disinclined to discover we suck at it too. Still it would be great to have someone teach us if we do suck.

Yeah I didnt really think that statement out before I posted. That was pretty dumb of me.

That's a good point, I haven't considered that. Thanks!

I might very well be wrong. It was a strange thing to me, though creeped out is probably not the right way to put it.

That's a good point that I hadn't considered. I didn't let it spoil the moment, but I did find it strange. 'Creeped out" was probably overdoing the description.

What about the woman who turns down an offer of oral sex? I ran into one recently and it straight creeped me out.

Except lying or not, profit or not, the result of what Oswalt is saying here results in a profit for everyone, women especially. As a result I choose to withhold my skepticism.

Insofar as they are only self-held opinions, ones not necessarily based on facts, collective opinion, or reality.

Well theres a bit of a difference there. See a long time ago there was an episode of Family Matters where young Eddie Winslow lied to his teacher and told her his father would beat him if he didnt recieve a good grade. Eventually through a series of comical pratfalls Eddie's deception is discovered. The moral is…

Also how are your answers valid? They're valid 'opinions' sure, but there are also a lot of people who have the opinion that the moon landing didn't happen. Just because you hold a valid opinion doesn't automatically qualify it as either an acceptable opinion, or as a credible fact. I'm sorry but everyone not agreeing…

No it's not that you're automatically incorrect, it's that you've immediately swept in, without any facts, pointed out VERY specific things about Patton's appearance, personality, and stature, and compared them to that of a sex offender. That's not only not an argument, it's damned close to slander.

Wow, that is a lot of very specific jumps to very specific assumptions. I don't know Oswalt as a person either, but you sure seem to believe you do.