stillthrottledown
stillthrottledown
stillthrottledown

How many 100k SUVs do I see driving down the road at all? Very very few. A 100k+ SUV is pretty rare. That has nothing to do with buying an SUV/crossover for 100k and not being able to store things on the roof. It is ridiculous to sell a 100k SUV that can’t carry things. Now that is hilarious.

I’m saying 100k plus for Tesla cars with decent interiors at best, decent range at best, no performance beyond straight line speed is ridiculous. And straight line only for a short distance. Anything at long distance the Tesla’s “insane” acceleration gets wrecked.

That is equally as sad.

Yes and that drives me nuts. Over time this Tesla buzzfeed style novelty will wear off. The overrated future cool - ecofriendly fantasy fetish will go away.

We can hope.

That is exactly why I chose them. The beauty of lavish luxury, size, combined with ridiculously powerful ICEs. The super SUV is magical when you think about it. The Model X has a lot things missing to make it a viable luxury SUV/crossover for 100-140k.

I know a lot of people who have carried things on their roof. When you have enough people to fill an SUV to the point you can’t fold the rear seats sometimes the roof is a good storage place. Also there are things like kayaks, mattresses, and other stuff that you need a roof to transport on.

I don’t need to click the link. I’ve known how the doors will open for months like everyone else. In the event that something is blocking conventional doors from opening all the way you can get out by sliding between the gap. If something is preventing the Model X doors from completely opening you would have to crawl

These all look light years better and have doors that don’t cut their roof in half.

Yup, definitely the uglies luxury SUV in my book. Aside from Lexus, but we weren’t counting that lol.

Tesla doesn’t want logic. They want gimmicks so their cars are shared all over buzzfeed and the rest of the simple internet realm.

You can slide out of a SUV/Crossover with normal doors. With this thing you’d have to slide under/crawl out of the vehicle.

An SUV that can’t carry very much stuff on the roof. If you have something on the roof I guess you are not opening your rear doors haha. I wonder how much the range will be reduced when you start towing things and adding weight to this crossover abomination.

$100,000? Hahaha Tesla needs to go sit down somewhere. There are so many better cars to spend $100,000. A $100,000 crossover... Hahaha hahaha

Not when every other car is is the same level of sport. The ATS V6 is praised on the website without hesitation. Don’t try and pull that garbage. I know what I’m talking about.

That is an interesting take. I’m not a RR person, but I could see the attraction to them. They have a certain presence a supercar just doesn’t have.

Ditch the Royce for an RS7 or M6 and It’d be an almost perfect new car garage. I guess you could ditch the RR for both hahaha.

Caddy is hilariously overrated here. No doubt in my mind I’d drive a C class, A/S/RS 4/5, and 3 and 4 series over an ATS. Just because they aren’t making complete shit cars like they used to doesn’t make Cadillac automotive gods.

And please please don’t start me on the gauges.

Just of the top of my head I can think it happening with these cars: the Hellcat cars, Tesla Model S with D in the name (Damon still only writes about Tesla), C7 Z06, Cadillac V cars, and it was so so so freaking bad with the new Ford GT. Sometimes they get so obsessed with certain cars they miss other cars being

When I see stuff like this from other places it calls a lot into question. (Unfortunately no C Class in here). I find it difficult to understand how a car with that bad braking gets universal praise on here. The S4 dominated the figure at handling test. We should note the Caddy is last in every category here and

It drives me freaking crazy. Thank god the old CTS V is out if production so I don’t have read about it on here everyday