stewartjk1--disqus
I'm Not Your Buddy Guy
stewartjk1--disqus

Hey Mr. PC-Much Loved Character, Sanders most certainly does demonize the wealthy. "Demonize" doesn't mean he accused them of being rapists, and in fact tektryk went out of his way to say that Sanders was NOT as immoral as Trump, only that he is just as from the center politically. Sounds like someone intruded into

Looking through my playlists and that actually not too bad an idea. Beatles, Stones, Beach Boys, Fleetwood Mac, GBV, I'm sure there are a lot of other exceptions but you're right that most bands fall way off after album #5 if not before.

One can agree with Sanders on a majority of positions (I do) and still think he'd be a lousy nominee. He's too far left to win, barring a Trump third party run, and let's say he were to win with a 44 percent electoral plurality, he's far too left to govern. Think Bush 2000 with much, much less of a popular mandate.

No, because Sanders is a clear #2 in a major party's nomination process, which is much higher than Paul or Kucinich ever got. If something were to happen to Clinton, Sanders is all the Democrats have.

She's old, in questionable health and under criminal investigation. Not saying she won't be the nominee, just saying there are plenty of scenarios in which she might not be. And, if she falters, Sanders is, somehow, the only Democratic candidate in a position to take advantage. Say what you will about the

Perfection. Or maybe Karl authored The History of True Crime in the Midwest.

Only 8 entries, is this part 1 or something?

This should be a Great Job, Internet!

No, he isn't.

2009 was the best? To me, it's unlistenable crap (AV Club suddenly likes the Black Eyed Peas because they are mashed? :)). But the video just reminded me how cute Miley used to be.

And where would Woody Allen be without Judaism??

Since we are going to make grand pronouncements about a film we haven't seen, I will just point out this scores 83 on the Tomatometer. Could be it just didn't appeal to this reviewer but he seems to be in the minority. Based on other reviews, I plan to see this at the first opportunity. The director of Passing

What if said patron refuses to turn over the phone, or lies and says s/he doesn't have a phone, or brings two phones.

"Swinger" is the new "fa__ot." You can hear it in the fundamentalist
comments. "If we let gays marry, what next? Group marriages? A man marrying
his son? A woman marrying her dog?" So nonmonogamists are clearly
below homosexuals on the moral ladder, but at least we rank above
pedophiles and zoophiles.

Take it from someone who was in a fun triad for several months in 2015, no one who has threesomes regularly does not like threesomes.

A well written and gripping story doesn't require SHOCKING PLOT TWISTS!! I mean don't tell M. Night Shaymalan or JJ Abrams, but good writing, even good action film writing, can stand on its own without them. Star Wars I, I mean IV, I mean A New Hope, did just fine without any shocking reveals. So did the first run

Excellent review as usual! How do they get written and posted so quickly?

One of them got away, right?

Yes, wtf?

The headline writer of the paper didn't know how to spell "chieftain." Happens all the time in small-city papers. Of course the makers of Fargo know how to spell it, silly.