So an author interviews a subject a number of times, probably interviews those who work with that subject, and you reject that author's conclusions because he's probably sexist and just projecting without any citation or fact other than how you feel? Fucks sake....

Take giant leaps of logic very often? Cause ya are here. I said no such thing. To imagine that a women would use her looks and femininity to persuade people (just as men often use stereotypically male traits to gain favor), is not shocking or strange. Try living in the real world for a while.

So the fact that the author has interviewed her many times and also people who have interacted with her is of no consequence? By your logic every biographer ever is just making it up.

Read the article, the author was discussing how she acts. The fact is that she uses her feminine wiles in a variety of ways to gain power. Stating that she uses her good looks to get what she wants is not sexist or unrelated. It directly reflects on who she is

Read the article, the author was discussing how she acts. The fact is that she uses her feminine wiles in a variety of ways to gain power. Stating that she uses her good looks to get what she wants is not sexist or unrelated. It directly reflects on who she is.

Stop slut shaming! Don't you know you are free to do whatever you want and the government will stop any negative repercussions of your life choices. Just like the Founding Fathers imagined.

But how else are we supposed to save people from their self-created problems?

He's falsely accused of rape and he becomes the villain? That's fucked up.

They need retroactive abortions as well.

So a child dying because of faith in god is bad, but killing a fetus because somebody "just isn't ready" is a moral right? Got it...

especially when lots of people have seen the part of you that said baby will come out of.

You're not good at the whole "stability" thing are ya?

You can't throw a party open to the public and then expect the weirdos and nerds not to eventually show up in full force.

Have you heard a lot of sad and shriveled things today? I want to know my competition.

Other than proximity, it's not. Why would you have your home address on the internet?!?

You are the one misdirecting. Its not a regular street. She posted pictures of herself on the internet. The WORLD WIDE WEB. Nobody can be outraged when the creep laden internet takes over.

Girl walks down a street full of rapists and muggers, yes, I put some blame on her. There are crazy fucked up people in this world and they are only multiplying. You can't just say don't be creepy internet or don't rape. That's like yelling at tornado to stop. It's a worthless solution and therefore not a solution at…

Hold up, when did we pigeonhole this to just reddits? I'd venture that every female facebook profile has been masturbated to at least once, just not publicly subreddited about.

YES! And there is nothing I can do about it. And if I get offended by it, its my own damn fault!

Nice try. Replace that with something similar to the internet, like parking your car on the street in south central LA or downtown Detroit or crossing the DC Beltway in rush hour. Still going to blame the victim?