So the government being less efficient with what little money there is, is the better choice?!?

Yes, and private charity provides those services with less overhead and in a more efficient manner because those charities risk going under if they spend their funds poorly. Instead we have massive amounts of waste and no oversight when the government provides them.

Oh, you mean the bank deregulation that wasn't actually deregulation at all, forced banks to make crappy loans to bad candidates and were backed up by the federal government eliminating all risk from such crappy loans? Do you know what deregulation means?

And that is 100% idiotic, however, it is also not the topic of conversation.

When was the last time there has been a large reduction in both socioeconomic programs and a significant lowering of individual and corporate taxes enough to free up money for charities? There hasn't been.

I never blamed one group. Please do not put words into my mouth. The problem is culturally wide and cuts across whatever demographics you feel the need to try to divide people into.

But your big government/tax and spend policy is not the best or most efficient way to combat those social ills. Private enterprise/charity is. Your way stagnates us. Humans are very entrepreneurial and advances are made best in an environment that does not stifle that creativity.

The highest teen pregnancy rate in the industrialized world is not what I would call a "conservative" country.

The correct question is who should be paying for it. I posit not other taxpayers.

And you're not very creative.

Nope and its just as valid as the statement that that is not a real that happens.

It doesn't happen because of procedures in the story above.

I'm okay with locking up Kathy Griffin and Dane Cook too.

I was outraged. Then I youtubed her "comedy." Now I support solitary confinement for her for life. Just awful.

Congrats! It's now about your pissy man-hating thread jacking outrage! You're the perfect conforming non-conformist feminist snowflake.

What if I interrogate all of that and objectively find that I like skinny white girls and that Twitter just can't find a qualified female board member/more qualified male members?

Yes, the latter. Believe it or not, I don't ordinarily shove my back hair/pelt into conversations when not warranted.

Actually the other poster did when he/she/it made a dickish comment about men being disrespected for running topless. Nice try though, sweetcakes.

I am pretty sure I am not garnering respect when my beer gut, ample back hair and bad tattoos are flopping all over the trail on hot days.

Google her father Carroll Dunham. You realize that her talentlessness is inherited.