Oh, Nintendo! Why do you not have cross buy on something like Shovel Knight? Not sure which platform I want it on.

I commend these two. It's still bitter to me that Mario U, and Mario World do not have online co op.

I don't know. There's only been a few times that I actually agreed something needed to be nerfed, and that was from recent games too. Sagat in Street Fighter IV was ungodly because of his range, and damage. The Stinger in Battlefield 4 as you mentioned. Though really, in Battlefield 3 it was terrible too.

Dear God, why do I venture from Kotaku?

Glad to know I'm not the only one.

Don't take me as a saint (as remotely from it as possible), but I always try to be patient, and mannerly to anyone in food service/retail. I know they're getting run over by some of the snottiest people. Scratch that out. Restaurant customers, and retail customers are like people who post on the internet. Okay, not…

I messed with it over the weekend, but didn't notice a big difference. Then again, over distance that would require scoping the AR was terrible anyways. The problem I actually had was with the DMR and BR that I would normally scope in with on older Halo games. Getting plinked dropped you out of scope mode. Which to me…

The turn around there is you don't get to online with others in several of their big multiplayer games. I need my happy medium on this one.

When did this become flag football?

Two entries already.

Fuck it. I'm done for the day now.

Too bad that, as far as driving goes, Driveclub sucks.

Happy birthday to me, happy birthday to me!

Haters gonna hate, but I wish the M570 trackball wasn't wireless. That's one of the reasons I've held onto my wired one for the better part of ten years.

Haters gonna hate, but I wish the M570 trackball wasn't wireless. That's one of the reasons I've held onto my wired…

They do more than a costume. In fact their biggest advertisement has been for Smash Bros. where they've shown they will add a character into the game. This is just another layer on top of this. It's not even an opinion. He has no opinion since he's never used one anyways.

I wasn't expecting a review article. I was expecting that with him saying he didn't understand them, that he had used them. Which he clearly didn't, yet feels the need to downplay them. Whether this is an opinion piece or not, it literally boils down to a throw away comment from one of the grays.

That's my entire point! He literally took the time to write an article to be posted without any experience even though he has the means. That entire first article is that he received them, obviously for review purposes, and just tossed them to the side. Now, he has a write up basically downplaying the appeal of the…

WHA?! That quite was taken DIRECTLY from the opening of the article! He literally said at the start that he hasn't played with them! There's no way he could possibly understand them without using one. The entire article is completely pointless. If he had used them, and then didn't understand the appeal, that would be…

What is the point of this article? The entire first article was some drivel about how a toddler plays with a toy. Then, we get this gem of an opening statement:

Well, when the defining statement of you article is this: