steph2013a
Steph2013a
steph2013a

Assume that means, by extension, less Jason Biggs.

I really hope less Piper also means less Larry.

I don't dislike her. But I hate her husband. So if seeing less of her means seeing less of him, Hallelujah!

1. Less Piper.

Yeeep, all of my male classmates are wearing tight V-necks, and I happen to find collarbones and exposed necks to be extremely attractive, so I demand that all men should now wear baggy sweaters and scarves. So that, y'know, the distraction was out of my sight while I'm doing some important learning here.

Male Burkhas FTW!

Wrist cleavage??!! Oh myyy, I think I need my smelling salts.

I am often distracted and turned on by men with really attractive faces. Can we have them cover their faces too, JIC they are super hot and distracting.

I like a solid-looking wrist with a nice (not necessarily expensive, but stylish) watch, so I really don't find it professional if I have to deal with the distraction of some guy (who's already not wearing a suit jacket or blazer) flip up his cuffs, or wear shirts with insufficiently long sleeves (long arms are no

Oh my god forearms. Veiny ones with a light dusting of hair. Wait, what was that about a Medicare article you needed me to write? Muuuuuscles.

Also, those tight white t-shirts so popular with college guys... very, very distracting.

Everyone is talking about clothing and professionalism. PLEASE NOTE THE SIGN SAYS NOTHING ABOUT PROFESSIONALISM. It's not asking for people to dress for the job they want, it's only slut-shaming, you guys. That's all it's doing.

Oooh gotcha! You win, debates over; cause it's impossible for women to internalize sexism and police other women's behavior right?! That NEVER happens.

My mom (RIP) used to wear a t-shirt very similar to this. She lived in a different time and place.

No, idiot. If you see her cleavage, you're not looking at the professor.

It's interesting one of the primary reasons that this sort of double-standard has gone without strong challenge is the very civility of women. If women students started turning cars over and kicking ass when ridiculous shit appeared as rules, administrators would suddenly have a much more enlightened perspective- and

And yet another epic fail for dress codes! Yeesh. If administrators (of any educational institution) in their private-at-home-in-their-heads-thoughts believe, "These naked ladies with their nudey-nudeness are a distraction! This must be stopped! Our boys are pure and must learn all the learning!" That's fine. That's

Clearly, then, the thing for all female students to do is wear clothing that as revealing as possible, to smash the GPAs of their male competitors.

I was in a meeting yesterday with a fella who was wearing a business shirt and tie, but his sleeves were a bit short and his forearms were exposed. I have a bit of a thing for a nicely turned arm, so can we ensure sleeves on men cover the wrist please? It was extremely distracting.

UT: HOOK 'EM (we-can't-control-our-) HORN(ie)S, [so we blame the women.]