After Fauci, anything would look respectable by comparison.

Nah, their definitions and scopes have just become extremely wide so as to largely become meaningless. Like this line from the lady: It doesn’t just malign me, but women everywhere. Nah, it’s really just you that he was talking about.

Duh, they ain’t ever getting older.

You could have simplified that sentence to “Andrew Cuomo is livid.”  Or maybe even “Cuomo is livid”, so as to define both brothers accurately.

Then again, people who get vilified by so many people are usually A) extremely saintly people who are getting targeted, or B) actual villains.  You admitted it’s not A, so...

Ok, let me ask an unpopular question: How did this become about her being a woman? If he’d said “f-ing son of a b*tch” to another man, I don’t think that man would have gotten in front of a mic to decry the assault on his manhood.

This.  iMessage is like the nicotine of their entire system.  It works well only with others that use it, but ostracizes you from outsiders.  And if you try to leave it...

Whoa whoa whoa.....  let’s keep it friendly now.   Grouping Hangouts in with Meet is just not cool.  Hangouts is the longstanding champ of cross-platform chat in my family.  If Google would support it, it would dominate.

Same here.  I’m rocking a Pixel 3a and also a samsung device.  Both are no go.

That’s a bad example. A taser tases. That’s what it’s built to do. A vehicle isn’t built to run over people. It’s built for transport.

I’m offended that you profiled this behavior by some racial stereotype.  Ok, not really.  Just trying to fit in these days.

Or, just go out and get in a time machine, go back a few years, and buy any midrange Android and enjoy all of the best features now.

I’m still using the sunset edition of Microsoft Money.  No problems.

I wonder if people wouldn’t more readily consider and ultimately accept some of these assertions if the language was altered to be a bit less accusatory. After all, few people consider themselves privileged, but they may buy that someone else has disadvantages.

Why? There have to be fewer than 1% of kids that believe a person is inherently inferior due to their race. Similar for adults.

I’m glad to see the right question being asked for once. Which makes more sense, to attempt to suss out the minor failings of all of society or fix the major failings of one particular job that is responsible for these awful outcomes?

See this, Rachel? The ones you’re attempting to support aren’t colorblind after all.

[deleted].

This is a very even-handed article. When this topic is usually covered, it’s insulting to everyone not on one side of the argument, and you avoided that. I can certainly identify with the sentiment of the All Lives Matter response, and I think the “house on fire” metaphor is useful, but it seems that the metaphor…

Geez, it’s like playing liberal bingo