Yep, this 100%. They lucked out big time by signing both Lawrence and Fassbender to long-term deals and then having them both turn into massive stars (Fassbender was already kind of there but Lawrence went from a nobody to the biggest actress on the planet overnight) but it’s been awful for the movies as they now all f…

Also similar to Berry (and Luigi Galvini, for that matter), Lawrence has extremely strong opinions about the effect of electricity on amphibians.

I have a hard time believing that any assistant would think that saying, “You’re too fat to have a custom dress” would “cushion the blow” in this scenario in any way.

Yuppppp. A friend of mine asked his arch-conservative father, “Are you a white supremacist?” To which he loudly answered, “No!” However, at Christmas dinner, he was overheard talking about how Native American tribes used to wage war against each other all the time until Europeans came in and “fixed” the problem. Also,…

Some people, even though they’re obviously wet, love being wet, and go around being wet all the time in public don’t like being told out in the open that they are in fact wet.

Give it 5 years he’ll be combing/brushing his hair backwards.

He’s a Republican. If he gave any shits about the welfare of other black people, he would not be a Republican.

Why do you label someone “phobic” when they don’t like, approve, or don’t want to be around certain people.

I like your rant in theory, but to use your words... you should try to be smarter. The term does not mean what you think it means.

ho·mo·pho·bic

Sneakerheads don’t wear crappy shoes.

It’s like saying, “I’m an alcoholic, sometimes I have a Coors Light.”

I am a sneakerhead. I have 60 pairs of sneakers. I have enough pairs that I’m just estimating, really. I also don’t particularly love spending money, so a lot of my kicks were purchased off clearance racks at outlets—where already-discounted sneakers are discounted again.

The problem with satire is...people don’t always get it. And in not getting it, the ideas that we’re supposed to laugh are interpretted as good ideas.

This post very obviously puts The Office in historical context, it’s expressing that it’s difficult to do that when your overall goal is to be entertained.

Look, I’ve got no issue with the show. I’m just saying that “well it was different time” isn’t that good of a defense. Especially for a show that’s been off the air for, what, 5-6 years?

The time it was made? 2005? 

I remember learning in art history about religious zealots chiseling off the genitalia of Greek sculptures and clumsily adding fig leaves and wondering how anyone could come to do that.

Well, here we are.

You’re a ridiculous person.

But the “context of the time it was made” was “serious issues in workplaces were ignored and joked about”.  It’s not like that makes it much better.