But Gamora IS green (just like Rocket IS a Racoon, Groot IS a tree and Drax is uh, whatever Drax is ) It’s not like they retconned her that color
But Gamora IS green (just like Rocket IS a Racoon, Groot IS a tree and Drax is uh, whatever Drax is ) It’s not like they retconned her that color
And instead of dropping his stick immediately upon the impediment, he did the time-honored Blues tradition of overplaying the “interference” to get a penalty or whatever. Too bad for him it was his own man.
Just like Brian Elliott FALSELY ACCUSED the Blackhawks of goalie interference.
Good riddance? He’s the best thing to happen to MMA in ages you clown, love him or hate him his entertainment value is off the charts
The theatre: where fans are deliberately placed to where they can potentially interfere with the play.... then get kicked out of the theatre for interfering with the play, as if the possibility of it happening never even occurred to anyone before.
You’re an idiot.
My sympathies, Patrick. This is obviously a tricky topic for a reporter to cover fully and accurately, and I’m sorry that deranged individuals have decided to attack you (and your family) because they disagree with your coverage decisions.
Well, it’s a poorly-written piece. And unless your definition of “good” is vastly different than mine, LaRoche is not “good.”
Adam LaRoche isn’t like other professional athletes.
FYI the pic you used is one of a kid eating dippin dots...so.....
Yes. You get to take the helmet home!
But horses would still exist though, right? That would be like arguing Yao Ming wouldn’t exist in defense of abusing Chinese basketball players.
I’m not sure ‘we only raised these horses to brutally risk their lives’ is a strong argument for it.
Yes, technically incorrect usage of “who”. No, not “gibberish”. And perhaps this is not the best moment to be a dickbag grammar nazi.
Her attorney is garbage.
No. The suggestion that people should vote for a candidate whose policy positions and record are repugnant to them, simply because that candidate has made them sufficiently fearful of all possible alternatives, is repulsive.
I’m not saying her logic is faulty. I’m saying it’s repulsive. It’s the logic that has permitted one of the two parties to define itself by the narrowest possible marginal differences between itself and the other for more than 20 years—since Hillary’s husband won in ‘92, in fact—meeting the interests of its putative…
It’s really weird that people keep saying Sanders supporters are affluent. Where does this data come from?
No I’m not. In fact, I’m not rendering an opinion on whether anyone should or shouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton, at all. I’m just pointing out that the logic of her argument is, “Demanding a candidate who represents your interests is for the rich; everybody else has to take what the process gives them; therefore you…
no.