From 2002

You should offer your services to Jalopnik. They’d probably even pay you a pittance! 

Just to boost the invalidity of IFS, Media Bias Fact Check has also done an analysis on them and rated them as strong right leaning, with ‘mixed’ factual reporting. They’re simply not a reliable source.

I don’t know why I’m responding. The “institute” you sourced has repeatedly authored studies that have poor methodology, which means the very process of which they conducted a study were objectively bad. The article I referenced had a sample population of 2. Even sophomore Sociology students know better than to…

I think this is the largest quantity of vehicles that were lost/abandoned at sea due to a vessel sinking, however...

Respect. You are on. top. of. that. shit.   Was just about to post that. 

Image is sourced from the Institute for Family Studies.

Jones also argued that many of her constituents have been embarrassed by Tlaib’s behavior, including referring to President Donald Trump as a “mother-f——r” in calling for his impeachment on her first night in office.

Most normal thing that’s happened in the last couple of weeks, actually.

*checks watch* Yup, it’s WTF O’clock already

This part of Sanger’s history is almost as troubling as Washington owning slaves, but... you’re agreeing with a position the ugliest and most disgusting of Catholic “conservatives” have been claiming about her since I first read about her - forty years ago!

Kayleigh McYannyny

Clearly, she says “laurel.”

This reminds me of one of those brain teasers - I couldn’t have told you what words she’d said until I read it - and now it’s all I can hear and it makes perfect sense. But those words fit into the sounds now, wheras lying bitch doesn’t.

Wow - until I read the ‘don’t want to engage’ I would have said yes she called her a lying bitch. After reading what she said she wrote I agree that’s what she said (NOT Lying bitch).

Before writing about Margaret Sanger, I suggest people read the work of Esther Katz, the editor of the Margaret Sanger’s papers, for information about how Sanger’s record has been distorted. Here is a link to an article about Sanger: https://watermark.silverchair.com/3378350.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL…

You can’t just call your project that on a world wide, famous YouTube channel that makes money. Which Chris also did.

Right, I don’t see how the copyright holder would have any right to seize the vehicle. I can see having him take down the videos, but not seeing how it would result in the car being seized (couldn’t he take the parts and use it in another project?)

Of course, copyright holders are required to defend their properties