Having police know the community personally has negatives as well as it encourages bias. Bias in both directions. Not only are they more likely to cover up a crime for a friend/acquaintance, they are also more likely to harass people they don’t personally like.

Toxic Masculinity.

Yes, of course hardcore gamers should destroy casual players in a skill based game. The fix is propper matchmaking. Casual players should be playing against other casual players. The wrong solution is a weapon or skill combo that removes the need for skill.

Not only do you get 7 public transportation projects vs uber loss, you also get infinitely more public masturbation. Yay public transportation.

Nope. Only 55% of mass shooters are white (while being 60% of population). So pretty close to neutral representation.

The ‘mass shooters mostly white’ is actually a myth. Yes, if you ignore the difference in population size, sure, barely. But per capita? Not so much.

There is no Bioware. There is EA with a purchased trademark slapped on it like an 800 million dollar halloween mask. 

I get it, you see one side as innocent, the other side as comic-book evil. Fine. I will explain why it was still a foolish thing to do within your political interpretation.

It is the compiling a targeted list and distributing that list with inflammatory intent. You have a liberal politician compiling a list of conservative donors, then forwarding that list to a large group of people who hate ideology of the group on that list.  

That is not why that information is collected. That information is available to prevent financial corruption. Votes are private and secret to stop the very thing you suggest doing. Using threats and public shaming to control votes is unethical, immoral and dangerous. Doing the same to political supporters is no better.

Here is what makes it dangerous. Taking a list of names (and other information like employer and/or addresses) within a particular ideological group (ie, trump contributors or LGBT contributors) and tweeting it out to a large population who hates that ideological group, captioned with an inflammatory message is what…

The FEC (site in this article) includes address of the donor.  So while you may have a right to this information, if you tweet it out to a group that is hostile to the person at that address, you are crossing an ethical line.  

Address is also public information. In fact, address is available in the very site given in this article. Just because it is public, doesn’t mean it isn’t doxing. Unless publicizing addresses is no longer considered doxxing.

Doctors help people. Doctors like money. Doctors are not altruistic. Lack of doctors harms people.

Corect, people shouldn’t be living paycheck to paycheck. Unfortunately a large portion of people are completely shit with money. When those people also don’t make a lot, it will end badly.  But short of taking control over their finances, or magically solving human stupidity, there is no real fix.

How about you allow people to decide for themselves if they are worth it in their particular situation. They also could have had better business sense and made the regulation less restrictive so that they didn’t kill the industry.  

I am against death threats, rape threats, suggestions to kill yourself, doxing, faking screenshots, and many other things. I ALSO believe the dev is an entitled asshole who toxically shit on gamers and deserves to be called out. Because it is not an either or.

I have read the posts from the Devs. One of them, at least, is not a sweet person. They are an entitled asshole who very much owes people things. They have a Patreon making between 2000-7000 per month. You don’t get to take money from Gamers then turn around and shit on them and not expect angry responses. A decent…

The devs are lying their ass off in order to turn themselves into victims. I have read hundreds of tweets, and posts. I have not seen a single one with any sort of actual or even implied threat. Unless you consider “I would never buy from this dev” to be a ‘threat’.

I’m sorry my suggestion that the existence of one worse thing doesn’t negate other less-bad things, upsets you so much. Hit a little too close to home, I guess?