starklord
Starklord
starklord

Uh, oh! Something positive about the moderates at Freakonomics! YOU MUST BE A NAZI!

There is already investigation: there are endless tests of processes, safeguards, and the vote counting itself. There is zero—ZERO—actual evidence of any fraud in the three swing states. I have no real problem with the recount. It’s a waste of time and money, but neither my time nor my money.

Innocent until proven guilty. The ones making the (unfounded) accusations of “tampering” need to bring the evidence.

It’s 100% right. There is ZERO actual evidence of fraud.

It’s not a very good reason. There is zero real evidence of fraud. Of course it is theoretically possible, but there is just nothing that passes the sniff test.

There is zero real evidence of fraud. I’d love to reverse the decision, but their claims are really, really weak.

The 3.7M vote lead isn’t “a majority” of her popular vote lead: it’s 182% of it. She would literally be 1.7M votes behind him without it.

I’m male, but isn’t “steel gray” always a bluish-gray?

“Exactly 1%” is an absolutely incorrect take, and is factually wrong in every way. I have no idea where you came across it, but the source is not reputable.

“There’s no way...”

They are the anti-Raiders.

“the only television show worth watching recently”

...you guys are all kidding, right? Sure, the visual effects were incredible...but that’s literally the end of nice things to say.

I’m glad the Navajo won, but I’m a little surprised. Urban Outfitters should have argued (did?) that nation states are not protected as “brands”. (e.g. I can sell anything I want bearing a French flag, the names of French cultural landmarks, etc.) They’re lucky the court accepted the argument that the word Navajo

I know what I’m teaching my dad this weekend.

Definite HoFer.

I only clicked the article to see if Burlenko was actually going to say nice things about something. My left arm hurts.

This is terrifying.