star-raper
star-raper
star-raper

agreed, gannon here is the best designed character who seems to have many layers here. he looks vaguely snooty and aristocratic, but i would totally believe that this is a man who worked to get what he wants, this is emphasized by his burly physique...

how is it any different? also, in adventure time, when gender swapped the characters, they made them distinct. finn is a boy's boy in shorts, and fiona is a demure girl in a skirt. the dog has a kinda stoner attitude and the cat is a motherly black lady. these are distinctive differentiations. all i see here is

this is terrible. its just a purple link. id much rather her be in her normal princess vestments instead of her having to dress like a man. at least then it would be original, and would maintain her femininity instead of having to just be a androngenous guy.

this is an ok idea, but it has some issues with the link character who is always a non character. having him in the createsall kinds of problems given he is a guy who is purely reactionary because the player always controls him. say your idea is used, they would have make link into an actual character this time,

this design (while rendered beautifully) is a very weak character design. this is supposed to be a heroic zelda right? why remove her royalty status? why cant a princess be a hero? why make this a purple link? i say make her a real princess who has taken up the sword. otherwise she is just a dude with boobs.

that is exactly my point.

this zelda lacks an identity of her own. she is just an androgenous purple link. this is hardly a female hero.

im not saying the charcater needs a chainmail bikini. im saying the character design fails because the gender is indeterminable when the essence of the character is meant to be a heroic female. there are more approaches that couldve been done, but instead the artist (a good artist, just a weak design) has made a

thing is, women actually like to look and feel sexy or attractive. the same way how men like to feel strong and macho. i dont think it is right to strip away female characters of their obvious feminine qualities, because then they just become very generic or in worse cases become the guy with boobs. female

if zelda has to be a playable character, they SHOULD do the majora's mask approach... no one saving anybody. make it about PRINCESS zelda somehow isolated in some kind of foreign land where she is essentially a fish outta water story so she will have to grow from a pampered princess, into a real hero who must save

this is why i like majoras mask best. no rscuing any stupid invalids. the second anyone needs rescuing... leave it to the straw feminist to misguide the stupid and easily suckered people into thinkingthe designers are mysoginistic while ignoring the facts.

the problem i have with this design is that she hardly looks female anymore. AND would fall into Anita's stupid other trope anyway of just a guy with boobs. either way she would hypocritically love this idea only because it pannders to her ego.

isnt the appeal of mass effect to craft your own main character through choices? thats just not possible in a movie. im not a fan of the series, i actually dislike it... but i cant help but feel making a movie of this game would be a massive disaster for the fans and would be impossible to deliver any expectations.

BETRAYED ME.

behold, the true ugliness of humanity.

HEY LISTEN!

iconic individual character motifs...

dosent this kinda thingnly encourages more segregation? i mean, its really stupid. there is a reason you dont see autistic gamers making a stink about the way they are, because even they know it is stupid. i think this kickstarter is a scam to rip people off and ride the gay gamer train that is really hot right

was wondering this too...

prett good vaas.