There's a pilot shortage, and the Air Force is offering a salary of $225,000.

Have we reached the climax of Orlove's career?

The mystery is ballooning out of control.

The "Totally his fault" part, however, puts all the blame for the theft on the one who was stolen from. Yes, some responsibility lies with him for not keeping things out of sight, but I shouldn't HAVE to worry about my car getting broken into. It's not my fault that someone decided to be a worthless piece of shit.

In a similar vein, the P-51 Mustang is considered the most influential, possibly even the best fighter plane of all time because it was ahead of its time and outperformed so much of its competition. Just because it would get squashed by an A-10 doesn't mean that it's "not very good."

Historical timelines and automotive timelines don't mesh very well. Some may consider the modern era to have started with the advent of trains, which was well-before cars came about. For the automotive world, the modern era really began when fuel injection became common-place in the early '90s. The only claim to being…

Maybe it's just me, but I would think it would be the fault of the people who broke into his car. Because, you know, they're the ones without respect for personal belongings. If it's Hildebrand's fault, then he should be fined and put in jail for theft.

Cheaper than speeding tickets or an open track day. I'd hardly call it a waste. You also essentially get a car show and track-side seats for a race.

I used it just the other day to diagnose a faulty ignition coil. Very helpful indeed. You can even use it to analyze your driving habits, if you're so inclined.

Autocrossing is usually less than $40, and you typically get in at least 4 runs.

So, because we have idiots on the roads means we can't push our cars to the limits...on public roads? So if we removed all the idiots and allowed the "good" drivers to drive as they pleased, we would have fewer single car accidents? Do you know why men are in more fatal car accidents than women? It's because we make…

I clicked on here from Jalopnik and what is this I don't even.

Need to remove the bodywork with minimal damage to the underlying sheet metal? Just fill your car with acetylene and light it!

It won't be hard to get there yourself. Yeah, yeah, warranties and shit. But just crank up the boost, free flowing intake and exhaust, and a tune and you could be at 450 hp easy.

Dat 240 be all like "IMMA EAT YER DOOR! NOMNOMNOM!" and da 370 be all "Fuck off, 240! I've gots me sum driftinz to do!"

The same way a gymnast wins at, uh, gymnastics. Judges.

That sounds downright angry! And it still retains the Mustang V8 sound of the past mod-motors.

Heh, dingle arm.

It's been way past three years. WHEN IS HE COMING BACK!!??!?!?!

I see it largely like this: Would you expect Aston Martin to research and market an electric Vantage? No. Instead we get something like the Cygnet, which is bullshit. It won't sell, and it will only serve to tarnish Aston's image. And yet, they would be required by law to make it. Now, going in the opposite direction,…