Some people can't handle drinks, others porn, and some people just dont like kids. Many things can be abused, most often by unhealthy people. Porn can be fun, simple and carnal, as long as the viewer(s) are healthy, and can separate fiction/fantasy from reality. As far as objectifying women, even that is subjective,…

You do know there are couples that watch porn together. Additionally, how does lust tie to beating multiple people within an inch of their lives? Extra additionally, this guy blames the action for his action (lust, is something you know, you do, not something that does you), in addition to just being silly, it implies…

Steroids are a shadow defense, and a very weak/bad one at that. And I hope 'finding religion' is treated as irrelevant as me testifying what kind of shits I took two months ago.

"if anything the one that's being exploited is the woman"

In the most recent cases, the issue does not seem to be the length. But the fact that it is a single string of data, when combined with other public information it can be used to impersonate an individual for private loans.

"lol k"

The argument isnt found in the percentage of people with issues (a larger pool) that become known abusers (a smaller pool), instead it is the reverse, the percentage of abusers that have said issues. For example if 85% of abusers are shown to have experienced abuse (DV for example) then a link is more likely than not.…

"I think it's because the men don't get caught."

Simple fix: Not only should people be allowed to remove invalid debts, but they should be able to charge for their time, and sue for any side effects, and a measurable amount of pain and suffering, eg a lost loan, should = x amount of damages.

Or just use it as a public identifier, It should not be assumed to be private, and thus just because someone knows it, they have no power with it. Banks, and lenders need to treat it as public info, and seek stronger methods of verification. The liability should be their, not the individual. If they issue credit…

"talking about any kind of oppression that directly affects [them]"

Sadly I think everyone is sexist to some extent. Often the people who claim they aren't are often the worst offenders. Just like the people who claim to be "honest", or selfless. Organisms are inherently selfish, the natural instinct is to protect/promote oneself.

"If it's not about you, then it's not about you."

Common Law must be proved, it is not assumed. Additionally neither New York nor Cali. recognize common law, and since they had the ceremony out of the country it couldn't be pushed into a new state.

Agreed:

"That as a blanket statement just applies to just so many famous people."

I dont know, I only did it when I had to babysit a cousins baby (before I was actually a parent). No issue explosion, unless you count the laughs I received from my wife and cousin.

About as dangerous as the Gamersgate chin beards. Or 80% of the youtube commenting membership.

I am curious to see, of the single people who hire house cleaners what % are men vs women?

He wouldn't be expected to get a job?