sskendall
Kendall101
sskendall

Why is this such common behaviour, you have a captive audience, and you cant waste your time to even discuss your point of view in your own words. This is bad behaviour when used by anyone, but especially when applied so self righteously by a commenter who replied originally to another.

So LGBTQ can get married in all states? The law treats them equal? In what states does the law women given lesser rights than men? Finally whom in the LGBTQ movement claim that the movement represents straight people as well? (I have never seen this claim made).

The dark side of flirting: Extremely weak attempts at humor. Tsk tsk.

Here is a off topic comment, but I really wish google play would add a forums section to each play listing (think steam), or even just allow comments to be tagged for content. The way comments are organized (IMO) makes them often less then useful. (sometime I want to know potential bugs, or am searching for a feature,

"But that still means that less than 18% of all non-custodial parents who owe child support are women, so good luck with that one."

A one sided argument can only stand with the help of a double standard (e.g. gender roles). If you are against double standards only when they dont favor your bias or viewpoint, then you really aren't against them.

It is, especially for you, since you appear to do so very well. It is the KISS (Keep it short and simple- or the better known version: Keep it simple, stupid) principle, masterfully applied.

Thanks.

Excellent summary. BTW you seem to have a knack for summarizing complex issues in a though provoking way, I also enjoyed:

"Or are you saying because it's soccer no one cares?"

"What the fuck are you even going on about you stupid motherfucker?"

FYI, your caps lock key appears to be broken (or possibly working unnecessary overtime)

Was the survey that supports the articles 1-in-5 statement not use CTS (or something with similar weaknesses)?

I completely understand, there are trolls from both ends of the spectrum on gawker.

Great response. Also fuck being the perfect victim, you stopped being the perfect victim when you fought back, I would rather be the victor than the victim any day.

It didn't compute for me, since STD testing should not take more than a couple weeks at most. As far as the question being personal, you shared information about your sex life, so any specific questions about what you shared will inherently sound personal. I think people should wait as long as both parties are

Its almost like you listed your points in reverse order of importance. But I maybe completely wrong.

I think the best way to make this video a learning experience would be to have the girl walk, and then about 20-30 feet back have a physically intimidating (say 6'5" lean 300lbs) actor play a gay man (the actor doesn't have to be gay, but they should be a good actor). Once the mark starts pestering the girl (give him

I think the simplest explanation for someone who doesn't recognize a difference of perspectives between the sexs (or just from their own POV) is the following:

Read the second link and thought: