sskendall
Kendall101
sskendall

I wish the organizations that were responsible for monitoring these stats/ situations also had the power to conduct stings. Or that they would restart To Catch a Predator, (sans CH) and target companies hiring. Also include companies who post scammy employment ads for "Marketing" positions on job sites and

You seem to have written a hypothesis as a statement, and then are confused when it is challenged.

Its funny, you previously claimed you were only arguing "whoever does the action is responsible for doing the action", but this whole attack clearly demonstrates the opposite perspective. You argue to a simple point, then when you can not acknowledge holes in your own arguments you simply attack any opposition.

I am sorry I didn't realize how banal the argument was. You have been arguing that the person who pulled the trigger, pulled the trigger. Even though you mentioned one person lied, and one person killed another. "One of those actions is a crime". That argument seems to expand the situation beyond the scope of "the

I used to use gamestop for unimited rentals -In my limited income hs days. I found the question free return process to be the longest (6.99days) and cheapest (free within said window).

He pulled the trigger so he pulled the trigger is your argument? You remove any an all context and thats your response? So by your logic if someone is driving a car and hits someone or something that jumps in front of their car, they are responsible because their foot was on the pedal? More importantly what does that

I think you may be right. I may be mixing postings up. I think this was bad behaviour on the part of 4 parties (up to 6 people) the teenagers and the parents responsible for them that led to a tragic outcome. I keep seeing the blame pushed to the dad. I think there are too many elements for that to be in anyway fair.

As far as shooting himself in the head. Thats a silly, silly strawman. If someone runs across the freeway and gets hit, is it the drivers fault? Stawman 1 meet Strawman 2.

So he snuck into a house uninvited, remember this is not her house, it is her parents. Now since I keep seeing the argument that the dad MUST be abusive, and this boy was her boyfriend, then I would think he would have been made aware of the situation, and therefore know he was entering dangerous ground. If the father

Was that in the news at all? (I would like to read about it)

So every person you/I know was an abused child?

Sneaking into a persons house and hiding under their childs bed is not reasonable behaviour, even for a minor. While not a crime worthy of death, it is dangerous and reckless behavior. I wouldn't blame the boy, and it would be sad to blame his parents since it is tough to control kids at this age, but if he is not

Excellent point.

What slope are you slipping down? He didn't walk in the room an pull the trigger. There was a stranger in their house. And the person who invited them in, denied it.

Its probably mentioned, but when I hear Bro, I think of the So. Cal. Bro™ (inland empire), wears a mesh jersey, works at McDonalds, plans on being the future MMA superstar of the universe. If they have money they make on their own, its is spent on rec. vehicles (see dirt bikes and quads). The lifers actually earn

Could you please detail what you imagine those to be, and submit them to SNL in sketch comedy form?

Over the hood of his cah?

No shit, every other guy makes their own DIY brew. Is it due to the proximity to Golden (Coors)?

You do realize your comment is the source of discussion. Since you have nothing to link to, other then your tautologies, it has remained so. Strawmen and Association Fallacies don' t introduce depth.

I have only argue against you and your bloated, vapid comment. If you had simply said the first sentence, I would have said nothing, by itself it would have at least been clever, and interesting. But you had to go on and ruin anything positive you had with an empty diatribe. Seeing a person materbate with their