sskendall
Kendall101
sskendall

The reason this is such a debate is both parties acted childishly and awkward results blossomed. Yes she could have drawn a picture, and yes he could have not acted like a lost puppy. If they are both adults (assuming he was not handicapped and abandoned by his handler - in which case they the handler would be

I was going to say something similar. If your defining trait is niceness, that's sad. No real human with a full gamut of human emotions is always nice. Your just an emo guy with a flipped facade. Nice guy is ironic not just in the fact that it is fake but that it is a silly description. It's a weak label. Futhermore

I'm debating on either making a romex extension cord to run behind drywall for a mounted TV or adding an outlet. I assume the romex cord would be much easier (considering I already created ports and ran hdmi cords behind the drywall) but I have yet to find a break down of whats involved with adding an outlet (I assume

Arent there ones that have two outlets and two usb jacks? That way you dont loose an outlet? Or is there an issue with those?

While I agree it would be nice if the other party could tell you sooner it is everyone's job to control themselves. If you value your time don't waste much of it on someone who can't or won't communicate clearly. Most often this is based on a physical attraction, because if you truly knew the person you would know

People that don't like this method should view the post as a PSA. If it can be done it will. Creeps creep. Now I have to give you props as a consumerist. Dating sites are overpriced. If one is searching for info for protection it's fair use. Interest is grey. If you are trying to exploit a stranger then you know it's

I find the privilege issue curious. Assuming they are relative, what do they mean in a discussion? If a black man and a while woman are having a discussion who needs to check their privledge? What does the person of greater privilege do once determined?

I have wondered ever since I saw someone else post it, why major game companies dont offer a cheap type game service that acts like netflix. When I saw the post it specifically mentioned nintendo. Nintendo sells their classics for $5 a piece. And I assume people pay it, but I also assume those people are rare, and for

True: Electrical either works or it doesn't, Plumbing can look fine and then cost you 10K down the road because you induced a leak and didnt know. Of course Electrical can theoretically kill you, if you skip the safety step.

Good points, the first two seem to be contained within the golden rule. The big to small acknowledges the importance of self imposed limits, and discipline (this seems to be the elephant in the room for many.

This is such a horrible article. It seems to imply women are unable to negotiate future employment. Victimhood over empowerment. It does not provide stats on the industry, nor does it qualify requests. The job candidate may not have properly researched, and the author appears to have done none as well. Nothing

If there were more than TWO options in the election, this could be a potentially insightful comment. Unfortunately there are only two, therefore if one does not vote they way you beleive they should you can label them, without any pretext.

She commited to her answer. She likely has unwittingly provided actions that protected or assisted her husbands behavior, and even ties her identity to him. From her perspective either her husband is scum and by extension she is part of that, or he is a victim of some mythical conspiracy. Logic tells which is the

Unless you are playing a character here, you are damaged goods. You attack others dogmatically, and then are so absolutely dismissive, including attacks directed at other women. I think I have read you derail numerous threads, because no other view point belongs in your presence.

Whoa, that's quite a holy pile of Dogma!

If said when you were sitting looking content, you probably just got a shitty waiter, since that is a very strange comment. "A phone with internet."

Therefore beauty is a measurement of contributed benefit to others?

What principle does this claim to operate on? This seems like it goes beyond just attacking a woman's choice. It seems to imply that a woman is incapable of choosing? I have not read the bill, but it doesn't even limit by age, correct? It seems to imply that Woman+Pregnancy=Emotion^999=No longer able to function. Does

Rep. Greg Heartsill knows what your trying to do, and has preemptively blocked you. If the law included that provision, there would be a class action lawsuit against his mom's Dr. (Well Uncle Ned was actually a Veterinarian)

She was made to look like a fool because of her gender and his gender. That's the only reason the author used that term