these didn’t sell well when new:
jjhats
ssaxman
i agree I need to drive it but plenty of journalists have driven it and came away saying it was weak and needed a turbo. I tend to trust them more than myself because they are pros
nope
it drives better than a stock mk6 golf. it had the same engine as a mk6 gti so its not very far off.
this car should be a trademark case in how not to design a car. I will never understand why Toyota is allergic to boosting this car. its sad and laughable at the same time. Subaru turbos engines for years then designs a sports car without one. multiple people should be fired by now
he hasn’t driven one. he also thinks a car with all seats filled has more body roll than an empty one. hes a moron
so you googled the weight and made a huge assumption about how it drives. go drive one and stop making blind assumptions
eos drive exactly like golfs and jettas so plenty enthusiastic in my opinion
Your underplaying that they are real live complete cars which this diablo will never be
no one would buy this. as much as people really didn’t buy the flex ecoboost this would sit on showrooms forever
im surprised jalopnik wouldn’t spec theirs with the manual
I guess we enjoy different fast....I enjoy driving fast around corners autocross and racetracks. you enjoy mashing the throttle on the highway when a Camaro pulls up....I know which one is more fun
care to show me a review of one that calls it boring? its one of the most fun cars you can buy and arguably more fun to drive than a land yacht like this
You might be the only person on the planet to think a fiesta st is boring
NO WE DIDNT. Later yes but every example I posted is true for 1974. 1975 sucked more and 1976 sucked even more. You're wrong for the examples I posted specifically for the 1974 year only
rebadging a car is a huge crime against the auto industry. please just dont....
i never said they were american neither did the question. the 2002 you posted is a tii not a turbo. None of the turbos had a front bumper at all. The countach you posted is hilariously later prolly a 1982 model and again the car i posted is correct and did look exactly like the picture.
Really? Square tail lights bother you? Ok strawman
The 930 turbo was actually a 75 so it doesn't belong. Besides that every one I posted was the same in 73 so you're wrong