the title had me thinking of a garage fire. not exactly lost when you still have the 25k car in your possession and I see no reason for this car to depreciate from this point since its already been on the upswing
the title had me thinking of a garage fire. not exactly lost when you still have the 25k car in your possession and I see no reason for this car to depreciate from this point since its already been on the upswing
why does it look as low as my focus and have skinny sidewall tires? it doesn’t look anything like an suv and would probably suck offroad
this car looks the same ride height as my focus st so I cant feel confident going off road with it. the wheels and low profile tires don’t look right for an suv either. and finally the car is shaped like a jelly bean and looks to have very compromised rear seat room and storage capacity. it looks nothing like an suv…
this. I guess I was dumb for expecting it be an suv. this isn’t an suv in any way shape or form its just a bloated model S and a very ugly one at that
or handling, mpg, performance, or doors staying open when you open them
read last sentence of my post
auto tinting wouldn’t car what height you are but I hear what you are saying
not so much safety but overly complicated stupid feature for lavish luxury cars. it would be an automatic visor drop down. so when the sun hits the windshield it automatically comes down. idk why s class don’t have this already. that or auto tinting glass on the windshield to protect sun glare
OK nvm its only gonna take you 30 years to get out on top
automatic plus hunchback of notre dame convertible styling=cp
Ok consider this. At 4 miles round trip you cover 960 miles commuting each year. Let's propose you buy a ford fiesta for 15k. The fiesta gets 30 mpg. So now your using 32 gallons a year or roughly $100 in gas. This means you would have to drive your volt for 200 years before you start saving money because at 35k you…
there is a reason every touch screen phone with fold out keyboard died a quick and swift death. you cant bridge the two technologies and expect to satisfy both consumers. embrace the tech and go all out don’t half ass it.
the tesla doesn’t have a gas engine so the only proper way to compare the two is on their electric abilities because they are both supposed to be electric cars. the volt/elr has a range of 35 miles while the tesla has a range of 255 miles. if you fill the tank in the chevy($30) and charge the battery in 12-15 hours…
the Cadillac has a 35 mile range. the tesla is over 200. also ive said this before and ill say it again don’t half ass your electric offering! by keeping a gas engine in the bmw i3 bmw i8 volt and elr it says the manufacturer doesn’t trust electric drivetrains. it is their form of stepping their foot in the water and…
as is the:
I don't care how few miles its been driven a 6 year old car is not new. also there is no warranty and its still overpriced. another swing and a miss for the great tavarish.
if we want to get completely technical it was launched to dethrone the original corvette as the American sports car. to do this is added many features and luxuries the corvette lacked such as roll down windows or door handles. so even at its inception its aim was to be more luxurious than the competitors. its kind of…
I really don’t think its that bad.
hmm so in other words just like the original?
I don’t get the hate for this. I feel like people don’t get what the initial thunderbird was like. its was a slow stylish coupe for cruising. it was not a sports car or a muscle car. ford built exactly what they old one was and even had the proper idea to keep it rwd and v8.