squirrelterror1
SquirrelTerror
squirrelterror1

Your as bad as she is when it comes to saying nothing. The DIRECT QUESTION she was asked was:

Trump is reveling in his victory. Is he doing it in poor taste? Hell yes. Does he care? No.

The question is not about telling people not to be afraid. It’s not about telling people you want them to feel secure.

The fact you consider it deeply and profoundly cynical doesn’t meant it isn’t true.

Your complaint: She’s being asked a question about people feeling as though their children are unsafe from the police, and she gives a meandering response that doesn’t so much as acknowledge that fear.

He is cross-eyed so it may be the best he can do.

Dude, this whole thread is depressing. Do they not teach the Constitution in school anymore? How can this many people not understand how the First Amendment works and what it was intended to do? This is just #SAD! If Fox News ever got a hold of these comments they’d have a field day.

This.

The sheer amount of time this guy has spent to prove his “I hate Nazis!” bona-fides is amazing.

That’s right. To fight fascism you must yourself become a fascist. It’s truly the only solution.

If that’s what you wanted, she gave it to you:

If you don’t want to engage in civil discourse, don’t. See how far that gets you.

Ironically, the City Council meeting that Sacramento held to specifically address issues surrounding Stephen Clark’s killing was recorded, if not televised. And it was, indeed, a long conversation as the Council had set aside at least four hours, maybe more, to talk about it. Again, ironically, the people protesting

Jesus. The fact you’re this worked up over a WH press secretary makes me worry about your mental health. Get a fucking grip on yourself.

Take your meds and calm down.

For evidence that the proposed loopholes would never have been closed, see recent tax bill wherein many of the loopholes were not closed and/or were reduced but not eliminated.

LOL - Another “anti-fascist” that wants to censor everyone that doesn’t agree with him! Irony truly is lost on you, isn’t it?

That’s why I said neo-Nazi groups. There is literally no way for there to be a neo-Nazi group before the fall of the original group. That’s what “neo” means.

If you’re not responsible for paying the legal bills, it’s always easy to say “GO FIGHT IT OUT IN COURT YOU HUGE PUSSY! YOUR OBSTINATE REFUSAL TO SPEND COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY IS SOMETHING I CANNOT TOLERATE!”

Poor you. I’m sure you know that in the US the fact you claim someone from a different group has done you wrong gives you free license to harm them in turn, right? That’s how our law operates.