More than what you bothered to do to help the poor, similarly confused child. Next you’ll probably want me to pay her loans too. The kid’s got to learn to figure shit out sometime.

And people intentionally murder people all the time, for example, Seth Rich. He was shot twice. Do you think the gun went off “for whatever reason” twice?

The motive I attribute to the murderers is not “insane” and is, in fact, undisputed. Rich was murdered.

As I said, whether you call it arrest or detention is a distinction without a difference. The suspect is in custody no matter what you call it. The time spent in custody can be expanded to infinity for relatively flimsy reasons.

So, in your situation, they intended to rob him and “for whatever reason” the gun magically goes off and kills the suspect and then they leave and don’t take anything except a first-degree murder charge!

What? I provided her with the link from the story that lets her get the information she was looking for.

True. The last I’d heard, though, the PD would not release the actual policy. I’m not saying the Chief is a liar - and I’m willing to bet he’s not - but I find it hard to believe that the protocol is “run in willy-nilly and attack” because that’s not how any police protocol is written.

Arguably, a teacher would have more knowledge of the situation and would be less likely to screw up. Arguably. If a student ran up to a teacher and said “Cruz is the shooter!” the teacher would know who Cruz was and could have a target.

You’re rather selective in what you quote since you neglected this passage from later in the story:

It’s a simpler explanation than your “botched robbery” that involves a corpse with all his valuables on him. A great many things have to occur for your theory to be correct. Mine simply requires what we know: A murder.

We can agree you’re confused and I’d submit you’re easily reduced to that condition.

It’s more likely that no one wanted to rob him since . . . he wasn’t robbed.

And the murder investigation is not the murder.

So you subscribe to the theory that they were able to murder him, get away without any witnesses reporting the murder, but were unable to take what they presumably wanted off the dead body?

No. The lawsuit is literally suing Fox for saying Rich leaked documents to WikiLeaks. Fox reported Rick leaked thousands of e-mails to WikiLeaks. It then reported that the murder investigation was stalled as a result and they attributed it to Hillary Clinton.

No, there isn’t. Most robberies would involve the victim having something taken from him while Rich was found with his wallet, phone and watch.

The ability to detain for up to 48 hours makes the distinction between an arrest and detention meaningless. The point is that ICE can take you into custody on what amount to little more than a suspicion you’re here illegally.

If the chase is incident to an arrest they do.

Meh. Subpoenaing his business records is going to lead to wrangling over whether he has to that will take, oh, a few years to sort out.

Shouldn’t SOMEONE have a record of all of this?