LMAO

It’s amazing how the Internet can melt someone’s brain so much that they think Temple of Doom was “really awful”. It’s an okay action movie that’s not as good as the one before it or after it, so naturally you have to throw a tantrum and screech that it’s “awful”. Come on. You don’t believe it and we know it.

So YouTube may have led you astray here, but the main villain of a story isn’t deduced through a pseudo-logic puzzle.

Dude it’s a good game but it can’t tell you shit about real world politics

Wow, your comment is like you’re having a tantrum at extremely low volume.

This site’s dead, then?

A superhero can be definitely be an extraordinarily gifted person who uses that to complement their “super” abilities. Superheroes have often been that and successful, and it’s compelling when done well, which Spider-Man is.

But... that doesn’t apply here at all. They didn’t need a scene explaining it, so they cut the one that wasted time trying.

Boy, does it ever not matter all on its own that an adaptation undercuts characters from the source material. It’s usually a bad sign when it feels it needs to pay them homage and waste time outside of the story to do it.

IDK... the action set-piece at the end of X-Men is as much a mess as Breihan says, but the script seems to make it clear why Magneto needed Rogue to carry out his plan, and further, it’s key to his character, tying back to the verbal sparring between Magneto and Xavier at the beginning.

Shut up you socially awkward dweeb

Because she’s rich now and that’s the Western dream of becoming rich and famous from something you own, that you can shout your opinions and feelings with no self-control and everyone listening and there’s nothing to stop you.

The “RF” in the acronym is one term, though, “radical feminist”, that refers to a specific wave of feminist theory and practice that promotes ideas such as female separatism and political lesbianism, and that produced many of the old guard of ostensibly left-wing anti-trans activists among women.

Boycotts only work if an organization lays out a realistic list of demands before they appeal to others to refrain from things they’d usually do. In this case, your main strategy will be one that appeals to parents to join the boycott in spite of their kids complaining about it.

What’s [redacted], precious?

Hey, how about y’all just write the headline and let us decide if what’s described is “awesome”?

What happens if they do? What’s your preferred form of public tantrum? Don’t act like you suffer in silence. You read this site, I know you don’t.

Don’t worry... there’s always going to be someone on The Takeout who will tell you that not only are your subjective tastes “wrong” and theirs “right”, but will also commit to a performative emotional meltdown if you disagree.

You’re going to have a lot of fun on this site, whose writers and readers are 99.9% picky-eater children in the bodies of adults.

At least you understand, unlike the majority of writers and readers on this site, that your fussiness about food is the persistence of a childhood of picky eating.