25 upvotes on this comment suggests TV criticism is dead on A.V. Club.

Why bother looking him up

No, it’s not. What he’s saying is that entire sequences were already created for other games, not just the engine.

“work with”

.________. Creepy

Oh

No. No, we haven’t

“Actually, that would be awesome,”

Probably waiting for the game to be considered worth a port, which it will probably never be.

It’s a pun.

That’s pretty vague. What does it mean?

Final Fantasy X-2 is an excellent game. Given its look, the most unexpected superior aspect of it is that it might have the most mature, “grown-up” plot of the entire series, about what happens after the hero of the day tries to start living their life again in the world they saved.

Twilight Zone, because I don’t think people had much of a reason to expect that Picard would be a good show.

Too bad it was bad TV, so it doesn’t matter if it’s “adequate Star Trek” to most audiences.

You think people should only be TV critics for shows they already love. Can you see the gigantic hole in that idea?

Excitingly, you’re completely wrong.

I take it you’re being on-purpose dumb with those suggestions.

Thank you. It is so tedious to see people argue back and forth about their interpretations of “real Star Trek”, when the valid points here are:

The only thing dumber than this jerk-around season arc would have been the “reveal” that it was all a dream sequence orchestrated by a character never mentioned once in the series before then.

You’re in luck, because your concept of TV critics’ articles (they should be by and for people who love the show already and tell us everything that’s EPIC FOR THE WIN!) has won the day in almost every quarter.