sprazola
sprazola
sprazola

We all have a limit about what is appropriate to wear to school, some people just put that limit at a different place. You probably wouldn’t be happy if kids at your (childrens) school turned up just wearing panties or something. So the idea that being for some kind of clothing restriction in schools automatically

Yeah, Rooster even says something like “stop, you’re enjoying it too much”

That quote could be applied to Black Lives Matter, but you wouldn’t hear Jezebel dismissing them like this.

woops, wrong place

True grit (1969) has an interesting example.

Lindy has a very antagonistic way of writing. It worked more on Jezebel where everyone is all “Wooo girl power”, but in a national newspaper’s website it seems a bit out of place. She literally can’t not insult someone when she writes.

*particularly the headline* whoops

Just as long as trolling isn’t synonymous with disagreeing. There is no point to a comment section if the only thing you can do is approve of whatever the article says.

Just make sure that dissent from the main group is not automatically ban worthy. There is literally no point to a comments section if the only thing you can do is voice your agreement for whatever the article says.

Dreams are super interesting! It’s literally the only time we get to experience the full spectrum of human emotion! I’ve never accepted my own death outside of a dream, or truly been horrified or in mortal terror. I’ve never had waves of contentment and happiness as strong as I’ve felt in dreams. Plus you get to do

What is with the tone of this article, particularly the article? Do you have an ideological opposition to tech companies? They do something you support like give generous family leave, and you still sorta shoehorn something in about how it only benefits these tech bros you hate so much.

Jezebel wished she won so much because she was a black woman, and now they are glad she didn’t because she is anti LGBT. It must be weird finding your taste in music is so linked to your politics.

It wasn’t some crazy opinion at the time. They didn’t get to look decades into the future to see what people would say about the bill nowadays. Back then black communities fully supported laws that harshly penalized the drug dealers who pushed crack into their communities.

Yeah, the Catholic Church is a massive organisation that spans every continent on earth. It’s pretty harsh to criticize this pope for not doing enough modernizing. Anything more could split the whole church in 2. It’s easy to sit in some of the most progressive countries in the world and say the catholic church isn’t

One of the big selling points of legalization is to take money away from criminals and organised crime. Some kind of regulation stopping people who were part of that previous illegal trade (which often went along with other crime like violence and theft) from profiting using their existing contacts and user base seems

Yeah, if we start judging people based on our modern ethics then pretty soon we’ll end up unable to celebrate anyone born before 1960 or something.

Ok, fine. That’s you opinion. Plenty of people hold that opinion, and not just about cases that personally outrage you.

I posted it somewhere, I saw a more relevant place. Woops