.

Now you’re pissing me off.

Y

Wait, the Consumer Reports-Tesla circle jerk is over already? Who has to clean up?

Yeah, its insane how much they use that word in headlines. Insane!

Honda was probably still using parts from when the Civic wasn’t the size of the Accord. The parking brake may have been originally specced for a vehicle half that size. They might wanna check on the regular brakes while they’re at it...

“Hmm, I’m bored. What have I got to mess with? Ah, here’s that piece of sheet metal I’ve wondering what to do with. There’s my trusty sawzall. Aaaaand, there’s my neighbors red Lexus....”

I concluded tonight that Donald sniffs immediately after speaking a load of BS. It’s a tell. Yes, he sniffs a lot.

I’ve gotta be insane. I owned the sedan version of this exact car for 10 years... and I still voted Nice Price.

Pictured: a small car in 2016.

Simon and Garfunkle > Lauper

Don’t care. Want Sambar.

Million dollar idea: Retrofit kits to have normal fucking doors on this silly car. Put the standard falcon doors back on before you sell it because the fool who buys a second hand Model X will want to use them for a week or two before getting tired of them and retro-retrofitting the normal doors back on again.

VW does it best. Plunge then up-left. The plunge is what makes it feel right and prevents accidental engagement.

Came here for a “she can back that thing up” reply. Still waiting...

Come on, Torch. Show some tolerance for the Dutchman.

Is there some reason this isn’t light rail as opposed to a bus? I mean there cannot be a steering wheel, right? And the vehicle is permanently in some kind of track, right?

Tesla has shown that it will make some design choices out of vanity instead of cost effectiveness or even practicality.

I get the “game”, it’s just dumb. Not only does his arbritrary rule contradict the obvious way of tracking events like coin flips which is to do one after the other and record the resulting pattern but his lazy method of visually presenting his “games” contradicts it as well. He wants you to consider a series of…

Does it take a PhD to arbritrarily decide that not all consecutive HH flips will count for your “game”? Does it take a PhD to act like the statistical result of this arbitrary manipulation of tracking coin flips is amazing and unexpected? Is it the PhD making him sounds like a smug prick?