Your denialist attitude reeks of stink. I know you can’t bear the thought of your precious Tommy Boy being a cheater, but if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.

Yeah, this might be the first time in my life that I’m rooting for more lawyers to get involved.

Clearly by your Kinja name you have a dog in this hunt, but then why did he have to be such a dick during the Wells investigation? He got the suspension not only because of what the evidence looked like, but also because he refused to cooperate. And please don’t support the “But Tom Brady just can’t hand over his…

Honestly I would, but honestly I think Tom Brady is smug scum. I don’t really want his life, or general outlook at all.

The same reason that people believe in Trickle Down Economics.

The initial cause isn’t in doubt.

It’s not satire, it’s just another case of cognitive bias winning out over rational thought. I am not really in the camp of those who believe that the Koch brothers’ money filters far enough down to pay people to troll comment boards with anti-AGW disinformation, so I assume that at this level, these people genuinely…

I don’t have to provide you causal evidence. You are like a Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist. “YEAH? YOU THINK ALL THOSE PEOPLE DIED AT SANDY HOOK? PROVE IT.”

One of the biggest PR issues with Climate Change is that it’s overwhelming and scary, so people are eager to latch on to whatever shred of contraindication they can find. I can absolutely see why this happens; it is big and scary.

I honestly can’t tell if this is satire or not, you so perfectly capture the hypocrisy and utter blindness of the position.

Of course quality of the evidence matters most. It’s just really really rare that the entire scientific community relies on the crappiest evidence. I admit to not being a climatologist. But at various points I’ve read, with an open mind (because OF COURSE I want to believe nothing bad is happening because I’m a…

Which is sad since it is literally representative of the consensus of the scientific opinion on what’s happening right now in climate science. It’s actually one of the most impressive works of modern scientific literature one can access and read for free. People are really ignorant though when it comes to science…

I didn’t miss any points. I just noted that viewpoints are not the same as facts, and that beliefs are not the same as science, which was the crux of your point. This is true even if those science and facts are not 100% filled out (much like evolution and germ theory are not), but there are absolutely zero credible…

Huh? First, who has time to develop the expertise in these areas without funding? (And any anti-CC science is also, gasp, funded, often by parties with a financial stake in the outcome of policy. When 97 percent of experts agree on something, it’s usually because it’s true, not indicative of some ill-defined bias.…

“People who go into climate science do so largely based on a notion that they are going to help the environment. If there was strictly a scientific motivation they would likely go into another field”

LOL. Let’s semantics this shit until Florida is under water.... Actually, not the worst idea, man.

No, it’s really not. It’s people thinking they get to have a “viewpoint” on scientific fact. Go away and let the actual grownups discuss this. You aren’t equipped.

Emoticons,

The sad thing is that you don't really have to undermine it. You just need a FoxNews talking head to say that it is wrong and that is all the evidence their audience needs

Anyone that’s iffy on climate change, go read the IPCC AR5 synthesis report. The AR5 Synthesis Report Summary should be sufficient.