sploolps
sploolps
sploolps

Believe women (when it’s convenient)!

I would have voted for Warren if I had a chance. She was out before my primary. Then, they canceled the whole process before I got to vote.

It doesn’t create a conundrum for me. I don’t vote for rapists. 

I mean, that Karen is also a Bundy. It’s just more astroturfed protest.

The Mets article reminds me that this group of sites used to have a sports related one...

Who gives a shit? The point is communication. You knew it was covid; I knew it was covid.

Well, they probably don’t need the protection then, since they won’t be at the school.

Bad optics is his campaign style. His new ad certainly is something.

>Progressivism isn’t brand loyalty. It isn’t fealty to one vision or need one champion. It is wider than one narrow policy position.

Then why didn’t she retire when there was a Democratic president.

Democrats had both houses and the white house before 2010. They still made compromises. They still moderated their own policies.

Progressivism is not the same as liberal incrementalism. You can’t just say it’s progressive.

Where are the progressive politics in this race? You say it’s alive and well. Who is it’s champion?

How would anyone get past the first one?

“We know it’s not enough just to talk about Donald Trump. We also must lay out a more proactive, forward-looking agenda about what we are going to do when we get in office”

The Obama campaign showed that people get excited over a progressive candidate. That was dampened by him not being progressive in office, but that’s beside this point. There is no progressive in the race this year.

Would a 5-4 decision loss look better than 6-3?

Progress is wanting a candidate with only one rape allegation instead of many!

Who’s fault was it that Sanders lost the primary? Pretty sure you’d say Sanders

See? This is exactly what I was afraid of. Liberals just want to go have brunch again. All they care about is normalcy. Normal pre-2016 had a lot of problems and led directly to 2016.