The cherry on top is changing the real story so the wife leaves when in real life they stayed together.

They like it hot, so they might not mind as much as you think.

Self reported studies show women commit around 15-25% of sexual assaults and rape.

Technically they were never a nation, just traitors, thieves, and slavers.

Maybe separating children from their families. Been doing that since white people first showed up in America, before the original is inhabitants even had money.

Just like Harry Potter books.

My favorites are the shirts with the flag waving behind Jesus on the cross.

You don’t have to conform to someone’s beliefs to point out their hypocrisy. That’s often intrinsic to being able to do so.

If they were so smart they would be a rich pretty white cis actress.

Are you a “race realist”? Was The South just fighting for “state’s rights”?

You clearly have no idea what acting it.

Some people live in the real world and are that big of clueless assholes. I suspect she would be one of them.

Go shoot some immigrants.

And in 1607 England there weren’t any famous women to play women’s roles.

I don’t buy food from people I think are bigots. I hold her to the same standard.

She bought the script in a bidding war with other people who wanted to make it. She killed the movie. She is the reason it isn’t being made. Those are the facts.

You just explained why cis people shouldn’t play trans people.

And she actually believes this about trans people. She bought a script in a bidding war a trans person could have been in and killed the project when she didn’t get her way when she could have funded it and cast a trans actor. She’s trash.

Doing immoral things for money or you don’t need or out of boredom isn’t understandable or justified, it’s reprehensible. She bought a highly desirable script, cast herself, then killed a project someone else might have made with a trans actor because she didn’t get her way.

Dude in 1607 England: Name one bankable female actor!