I disagree strongly with Mr. Spohn on his analogy with homophobic slurs. I have never seen the term “blind playthrough” used in a negative connotation or intended to slander members of the disabled community. I can empathize with his resistance to the casual, and arguably flippant, use of a term that he feels should…

As someone pointed out earlier, the Un and Uri would be written similarly enough to be the same.  The English equivalent would be claiming it’s not him because you spelled it “Ury.”  Going back to my earlier response to another comment, it would like naming a dancing character Justan Timberlake and using it in…

It is not covered as parody. There’s a fine line between calling the character Un Geller and having it bend spoons and giving it a funny name like a Garbage Pail Kid and Nintendo stepped over it.  

It’s not referenced.  They called it Un Geller.  If I put a character in a game and call it Justin Timberlake you can damn well believe I’m getting a call from his lawyers. 

Read the article.  The character wasn’t named Kadabra at inception.

Global recognition has zip all to do with the legitimacy of his claim. They created a spoon bending character with his name. What they later called it in other markets is irrelevant.  

Clearly the person who named the character did. 

They named the card (and the character) after him. It very much is his card and his choice whether to allow them to use his name or not.

That stream is the reason there is now two TVs in my game room (albeit due to space issues, one is much smaller than his).

There is nothing new here. This is standard operating procedure for McMahon. He drove Sgt. Slaughter out of the (then) WWF in the 80s because he insisted on getting money from GI Joe.

Let’s just get this out of the way, address the elephant in the room, and acknowledge that having wealth, oil, and a royal title doesn’t exclude you from being a piece of s---.

Adam Cole’s involvement in UUDD leads me to believe that his YouTube account (and more importantly its monetization) fall under this division of WWE. (Not sure what it's called now; it was "New Media" back when Shane McMahon was running it.)

Since he wasn’t on the ballot on a single battleground state, the answer really comes down to “none.”

That’s my guess coupled with a compression error. 

It looks to me that the intended audience of this release is not the courts or the public, but other developers that might be inclined to join Epic’s suit. They want to establish the seed of thought that Epic is out for themselves and themselves only with this attempt at a sweetheart deal and that they are not to be…

I read this article and the words by themselves made sense so I was fairly certain that I wasn’t having a stroke. Then I scrolled back to the top and began reading it again, but his time mentally applied a Valley Girl infliction, wherein it all began to click into place. Nathan, you have missed your calling and I…

Your electric company is a utility.  Utilities are exempt from anti-trust legislation.

You don’t have to own everything to have a monopoly under US law, you merely have to have use your market power to either suppress fair trade OR force customer to engage in other financial transactions as a condition of doing business (“tying”).

Not a lawyer and don’t have any skin in the game, but my best guess is…

That’s not why cable is exempt. Cable is exempt from anti-trust law because it’s a utility.

Wasn’t there a Hyper Neo Geo game that used a 6 (7?) button layout?