spacerobot5
spacerobot5
spacerobot5

OK, the first "fully gay" character is great and all, but did they have to go full-on clone look, here?

The dialogue of that entire "cutscene" is so ingrained in my memory. Thank you for reminding me.

The rise of 24/7 TV News (and especially the Internet) placed a priority on speed over accuracy, at least in the corporate news world. There are (seemingly) few consequences for getting a story wrong these days.

It's just.... I know that every little detail is poured over and carefully planned in these things, but it's funny how they go through all of these crazy concepts just to arrive at a black box at the end. It seems like if anyone is going to put out a "weird-looking" system it's going to be Nintendo and not one of the

Pretty good for a student's final project of an animation course. B+

Your lack of faith is disturbing, but your best bet might be to look to the Star Trek reboots (also done by J.J. Abrams) to get at least a better idea of how the new Star Wars films will go.

The new Trek films have been much more "action-packed" than previous iterations in the franchise, but I think that tone fits

Let's also mention release pushbacks and cancellations haven't helped, either.

Watch Dogs was aiming to be a next-gen launch game that has since been pushed back and doesn't look nearly as good as early demos suggested, the big Star Wars bounty hunter game we all hoped for was scrapped, Dragon Age III was pushed back,

If someone offers you $2 billion for the company you helped found from a Kickstarter campaign, you sell. As much as I dislike Facebook and the potential to ruin the Oculus, I can't blame them for selling out (I kind of expected Microsoft to buy them. Or maybe Google).

Cuoco you say? I can get onboard with this.

Unfortunately, it's still a bad game. When there aren't graphical glitches, it actually looks quite beautiful, but the gameplay bugs and foibles are just too much. It's fun for an hour or two before you realize that the underlying simulation is so deeply flawed to make the game truly unplayable.

Perhaps, but at the time we really didn't know how good games would look on the next generation of systems as they weren't "official" at that early point of the Watch Dogs debut. A lot of media and regular folks were in awe because this was obviously a next gen game, so we were pushed into assuming that it was going

This edition has been one of my most disappointing game purchases. It's disheartening to know that I tossed in my support initially for a game that was so very, very broken. There were some great ideas here, but you couldn't play for long without running into the terrible AI and inaccurate data reporting, not to

Why not just have Galactus eat the Death Star for a light snack?

Sorry, but I think you're the only one on this one.

You can if there are enough folks willing to pay $300+ for it, which they can probably find the 500 or so to do such a thing. It's nice, but not $300 nice.

I don't think the point was to show every horror game ever made, but give a 3-minute overview of some of the highlights of the genre. There were still clips of Silent Hill 2 and 3 and a little bit of the good (old) Alone in the Dark.

I don't think the point was to show every horror game ever made, but give a 3-minute overview of some of the highlights of the genre. There were still clips of Silent Hill 2 and 3 and a little bit of the good (old) Alone in the Dark.

The pricing on their site was messed up. It said a pre-order discount to $19.49 but then jumped to $22.49 when you add it to your cart.