does anyone else think that the teddy bear that got mentioned a few times is a nanny cam? He turned it around so his actual violence wouldn't get filmed? Explains why he has video of his interactions, and none of these women seemed to mention a camera...

She also reminded victims that there is no statute of limitations on sexual assault, and that incidents can be investigated at any time.

As a gentleman just past mid-life, I resent this pricks behaviour being blamed on his age. He could have just bought a sports car like the rest if us. He's a dick, and I assume he's always been a dick long before he reached his late forties.

Great bouncing buddhas, what a psycho. He's using graphic sex videos to prove that consensual acts "could" leave bruises? Aaaaand, so can nonconsensual acts, which is what you're being accused of, bro. Unhinged is definitely the word. Total Logic Fail isn't a real word, but apropos anyway.

I think he may be enough of a narcissist to believe that he was untouchable. And he thought it was three women: a "vengeful" ex-girlfriend and two women she'd apparently convinced to talk.

Great parents can still have shitty kids despite their best efforts. And she seems to have been a good influence for the older daughter. She's not perfect, I'm sure, but she's a damn sight better than a mother who would date her own daughter's rapist.

I'm pretty sure that the media scrutiny here is the only thing that is/might be keeping this guy from preying on other members of the family. If they didn't have a TV show, chances are he would've already acted again (if, obviously, he hasn't already).

Sigh.

Rape isn't a "decision" made by anyone except the rapist. Nice try though. I hope you didn't hurt yourself too hard thinking about that one.

Sober enough to take pictures and record the rape, and put a towel over the security camera when they moved her, but too drunk to understand what he was taking pictures of and recording and why he was trying to cover up their actions? It's not just a bad argument, it's literally nonsensical.

Yeah we're going to attack a women who loved video games so much that she wrote/directed/starred in 6 seasons worth of original youtube content that she gave away for FREE.

I don't care who they market games to; what I do care about is someone calling me a 'child' for enjoying some boobs.

Let's try to get to the core of the matter: What you're saying is that games should be marketed to women,

Partially because there aren't hordes of people publicly fantasizing about raping Peter King or making credible terrorist threats using his home address. (This kind of behavior tends to understandably divert attention from the central argument.) And also because there's no reason a video game developer can't date a…

Moreover, it isn't unique these gamers. The argument against Affirmative Action is based upon it's phantom victims (the white kid at the bottom of the yes pile who gets bumped). #notallmen is a strawman based on the false belief that feminism is blaming all men for bad deeds (missing the whole point). The whole…

This is valid to a point, but point to one privileged group that's ever raised its hand and said, Yep, too much influence here, that's just about enough for us, thanks.

Oh, the "fake feminists" started it? Not the ex who enlisted a bunch of clowns to attack and vilify a woman based solely on the notion that she'd maybe slept with some guys and those guys may have written about her game? Those people jumped at the chance to excoriate Zoe Quinn and when they rightly got called on their…

Just to preempt an annoying line of thought before it takes root down here, #NotYourShield, or anyone objecting to the broader forces at work here using for an argument, "But I'm black," or, "I'm a woman," is not a good argument. It doesn't even hold up to its own internal logic. Minority vioces matter, and should be…