i think even the people who work at jezebel know that it’s homer and it’s not even close

luckily for Zach they can’t convict you of an intent to commit a crime, you actually have to commit it (cf, Sixth amendment)

historically the Players was in March. it only recently moved to May.

This is a partnership though which is a totally different part of the constitution

how can they have standing, they don’t have any legs

if you had wings is the greatest song ever

unfortunately the Diamondbacks don’t have standing so there’s that problem

When I need to be productive at work I put on the Epcot entrance music loop and wait for the magic to happen.

i knew he was hard up for a statue but this is ridiculous

imagine if this had happened when twitter was around

You’re confusing the term “fact” with “not inaccurate statement”. Saying that something could or could not happen is not a fact. It may not be an incorrect statement, but it’s not a fact. The term fact refers to things that are known to exist or to have happened.

I stated a fact, that the people in Chicago could say ‘fuck it’ and not complete the task. This is a possibility. This is not a theory, this is a fact. They could do this.

I think one of us does: “...an area or division, especially part of a country or the world having definable characteristics but not always fixed boundaries”. No one refers to a region when they’re talking about an area with very defined boundaries. “Oh I live in the Georgia region of America”.

it’s not region based you dumbass, it’s based what the 10,000 people in the park do. 10,000 diehard level 30+ trainers who paid money to be there.

I am not a lawyer either like my brother but I believe there is a Statute of Limitations problem here and also I would bet that these kids don’t have any Standing, this generation just sits around all day on their phones.

“CrossFit Athlete” has long been considered a synonym for “douche”, so yes, he is definitely a world-class CrossFit Athlete.

After a decade off, I decided that I needed to start golfing again.

on what planet is an independent and external review mutually exclusive from legal advice. why do you think they hired a law firm? because lawyers are sherlock fucking holmes?

to the contrary, there was a clear indication that Pepper Hamilton was representing Baylor’s interest in the first email. it literally says it right in the quoted portion. so you may not be a legal mind, but you know more than this writer.

why do you think they hired attorneys? because they’re mangum p.i. or because they knew the advice would be privileged. who in the hell would engage an attorney to produce discoverable work product.