southmetrowag
SMetroWag
southmetrowag

“The assault was filmed by a security camera” is not the same as ““The girl told KPIX5 that police secured surveillance video that captures portions of the assault.”

The first statement states as fact that the assault was filmed by a security camera. The second statement says that someone told a news source that a

You have absolutely no facts on which to base such a conclusion. Have we learned nothing from Duke and UVa etc. There are (THERE ARE) false allegations of rape made.

*sigh* but we MUST believe the accuser - Right??

No - it wasn’t and the link doesn’t say that.

Here is what is reported “The girl told KPIX5 that police secured surveillance video that captures portions of the assault.” HUGE difference.

Sloppy reading and inaccurate reporting —- again.

UVa, Duke, etc. etc. etc.

“ at least six of the electoral voters this election have stated that they won’t vote for Trump, despite the fact that he won their states”.

If you read the article to which you link you will see that your statement above is wrong. I think it’s a typo or a proofreading error. Six electors who are committed to

I get the importance of protecting a woman’s right to choose. But how do you get from disagreeing with someone about abortion rights to MONSTER because he thinks that human embryo remains should be treated with dignity and in a manner similar to the remains of a human who had been born? I get why you might think it

I think I am the only one who realizes that you were joking/trolling. The responses you received were hilarious if you got the joke.

Gosh - you’re uninformed. The access to birth control is a constitutionally protected right that can’t be abolished by executive fiat. What you probably meant was that the opportunity to have ME pay for YOUR birth control might go away. Tell you what, if I stay out of your uterus, how about you stay out of my

Remember that the author of this piece is the same person who gave us this gem:

Nice. Classy move there.

Tell me again why we should take you seriously as a writer and commentator.

“Because we aren’t fucking idiots.”

I beg to differ.

dont have to go as far as Fox. I will say it right here. She is not a genuine baseball fan - her reactions are stilted and have the stink of being scripted. This is a crappy thing for her to do. She is not a good person.

Anna

This is a serious question - why should I (or anyone else) take you seriously after the way this UVa story has played out and the way you have written about it?

Can’t wait for the next Jezebel article about an alleged sexual assault so that we can all rush to judge and convict the accused. The fact that women DO LIE about sexual assault, that journalists dissemble in order to make a better story and that nothing should be believed at first blush will all be forgotten

does anyone believe this crap? Hillary would never actually be interested in anything so bourgeois as baseball. Her reactions are fake, forced and scripted - please someone tell her to stop.

Why does dreck like this even get any publicity? To me it appears like an unbalanced person who wants her 15 minutes of fame. But even if it isn’t, why aren’t the folks who are lighting the torches and sharpening the pitchforks concerned that it took her 17 years to come forward?

I think you underestimate juries. In my experience at least one or more jurors is aware - to some extent - of their entitlement to nullify unjust laws or the unjust implementation of just laws.

The right to a trial by jury exists for EXACTLY this situation. The jury is the last safeguard between an accused and the

The ignorance here concerns me. The jury gets to decide if the law makes sense and should be enforced. Jury nullification is an important element of our legal system. Can any of you lamenting the verdict allow for the possibility that the evidence presented to the jury showed that the defendants had a legitimate

Wow —- you really don’t understand the concept of “legal precedent”

This website is the best argument there is for the repeal of the 19th Amendment.

the ignorance comes from the people who are commenting when it is obvious they don’t know what the word “susceptible” means.