“The only people willing to endure that kind of gauntlet are ALL narcissistic sociopaths.”

Can’t quite say the call against the Vikings “allowed” the Packers to score a FG. It was 1st and 10 from the GB 38 and a defensive offside was called on the same play. Obviously, the roughing the passer is a bigger penalty, but it’s not like the Packers were going to have to punt or something.

Would they? Erase those 3 points, the Vikings score a td after halftime making it 17-14 Packers. Next drive the packers kick a FG then the Vikings score a TD again making it 21-20 Vikings. Packers kick a FG to take the lead with 2:13 left, putting the Vikings in basically the same exact position they were. So no, the…

There was a play, I forgot who was involved...but the defender breaks through, hugs the QB who has the ball...lets go...and the QB gains a yard or two on a scramble.

The word is “cromulent”.

Okay so take away those 3 points and then the 8 the Vikings scored because of this atrocious call and the Packers win

Except Kendricks drove Rodgers into the turf and put all of his body weight into it. Clay Matthews didn’t. Matthews put his arm out to break his fall and not put all of weight into Cousins. Also Matthews’s full weight is to the side of Cousins.

That sounds amazing

How can we be sure it’s soda and not sweet tea?

I’ve dipped french fries in a chocolate shake.  So f-ing good.

Wait, you mean having pineapple on pizza, or the debate about it?

As a San Diegite,...

society has progressed to a point where it strengthens a megastar’s brand to acknowledge racism rather than ignore it.

If what he said on the first episode was entirely pre-planned, he fooled me. He did discuss things he’s already publicly discussed, just in more detail here, but I thought his discussion opened up contributions from the guest stars who I haven’t heard speak so frankly before, such as OBJ, Candace Parker, and even…

Welcome to Deadspin, this is Billy! 

I’m just trying to figure out what the hell the point of any of this was. Of COURSE the show isn’t completely unedited/unfiltered/etc. This seems purely contrarian for contrarianism’s sake.

I disagree with this article’s implicit premise that if Lebron is not offending viewers, he is not being fully truthful. Perhaps Lebron, like most people, doesn’t have that many hard-line positions on controversial topics.

Billy Haisley’s article “there is nothing candid about lebron’s the shop” is a candid look at what Billy Haisely thought of the new HBO show. However, the real purpose of the article is to make money.

Wait so the UMPIRE is full of shit because two ANNOUNCERS said what the batter was doing? 😳

Bill Welke referred you to the rulebook. The rulebook is correct, not the announcers.