Everything about this response is arrogant and pretentious. Adios, you new-monied douchebags and/or entitled trust-funders.

You know it wasn’t a Mustang because it turned away from the pedestrians.

Can’t forget the LED bro-bar. For night time trips through the mall parking lot.

Update: Contacted the owner. I dd not see his car, but another RS that must be prowling the area in the same colors (they are the colors I’d pick for this car, so that’s understandable).

It’s not really either a nice price or a crack pipe, it just kind of exists.

Honestly, I don’t think blindspots came into play here.

FTFY.

It is possible that this car is not a Mustang at all. Notice that there are no pedestrians anywhere near the point of impact.

All of you, stop loving the F-type! Otherwise I can’t pick it up for 15-20K in a couple of years!

No hot tub in the back = CP

I choose cars solely on NP0CP comments. If the community at large gives a resounding endorsement of say, an 1997 Grand Am, I run out and get one before the market finds out and the prices skyrocket.

I’m nice pricing the shit out if this.

Our standards? These are legal conventions, not moral ones. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by pretending unnecessarily treating the enemy with kid gloves makes us morally superior. It’s sophistry. If the enemy wants to be treated as human beings, they can act like human beings. If they want to become legal…

“If we look up at the roof of this building there’s a lot of steel structure up there that’d [prohibit] some of the signals.”

More like this.

Looks like the Lexus grille wearing a bicycle helmet.