You mention many things that they should have done to respond to this instead of firing her. How do you know that they had not done this previously in regards to other issues? How do you know that this was not “the straw that broke the camel's back” as it were.

hard to imagine? Not at all. It’s easy when you don’t look at the world through an Ideological lense and actually look at the shit male devs get. IF you think male debs don’t get dumb criticism from people who don’t know anything then you live under the kotak rock and never look outside 

If you’re tired of criticism don’t open a public forum and engage with paying customers on it.

HE wasn’t a rando. He was a company partner AND customer who just the day before was singing her praises. In other words HE WAS PAYING HER BILLS. 

Bad comparison. When you are anonymous you are not representing your company. She was talking AS AN EMPLOYEE TO HER CUSTOMER BASE. A better comparison would be to a store clerk saying stuff to her customers as she bags their purchases.

Dont be absurd. She could have turned off twitter if it was getting to her. She chose not to and therefore is responsible for her statements. The pressure of an opt in situation Is irrelevant as long as it is opt in.

Told how to do her job? Did you even bother reading the tweet she was responding to? If not, do so now.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Logical falacy. Just because something occurs after an event does not mean it occured due to said event. 

Only when sex is involved. If you play an mmo no one asks first if they can start talking to you in Shakespearian english. They just do it. Don't make up rules. Should he have asked in THIS instance? Absolutely. But that is not a universal rule outside of sex rps

Buddy, you are looking in the wroooooong place for journalistic integrity.

“That’s part of the job—to make the game appeal to everyone”

Ah, look at all the mind readers here

What evidence to the contrary? what evidence do you have that this was motivated by race as opposed to general cantankerousness? Is ever nasty interaction directed at a black person done because they are black in your world view? 

If it was Mohammed, you would be right there with them calling it hate speech. If one religion’s figure is protected, then all should be.

You mean a game about pirates encourages playing like one? You don’t say.

Yes. Casually Quote marx in your article. A man who’s ideology killed more people than facism ever did. You realise that for people who come from former soviet states you might as well be quoting mein kampf.

Attack on Titan is about the last remnants of humanity trying to defeat the mindless, man-eating giants that ravage their world.

Attack on Titan is about the last remnants of humanity trying to defeat the mindless, man-eating giants that ravage their world.

Bohemia != all of europe. Nice try. There were black people in europe, not many but there were some. That does NOT make it historically accurate to put them in rural bohemia specifically

If snarky jibes are what you consider trolling, then the term has been watered down by thin skinned children to the point of it having lost any meaning or impact.