someonehastobethatguy
SomeoneHasToBeThatGuy
someonehastobethatguy

Yea, I guess. Off topic, but who thinks flying a minor by themselves is a good idea on any level? 

Yes, but premise is that it ought not to be. And also, yes, the service should be withdrawn.

I would never think to tune to AM radio in an emergency.
I do wish cars, especially vehicles like tacomas, 4runners, broncos, wranglers, would come with weather radio bands. That seems logical, am I missing the reasons cars to not come with weather bands in their car radios? 

Honestly, if someone wants AM that bad, why not just make it an option you can spec and remove it from the rest of the cars. I nor anyone I know has ever used AM in their life, why keep it for the extremely small percent of people that do? Make it an option or IDK, carry a small AM radio in your car if you are that

Given how airlines have been behaving toward customers lately... it’s not such a stretch anymore.

Well, airlines have put unaccompanied minors on the wrong flight before.

Vehicle lost traction? I’ve launched boats hundreds of times, of all sizes, using mostly 2wd trucks with highway tires on all kinds of ramps. Never had a worry about losing traction, maybe spin a little bit on mossy, weedy or gravel-on-concrete ramps.

Xi said it was a good idea. If people get distracted then clearly they are not good communists.

I blame this on people are stupid and don’t know how to drive/use their cars.

Holy distracted driving Batman, that does not seem like a good idea

This is a car blog site. Not a news site. The people writing these articles are bloggers, not journalists. While it looks and feels like news, its just regurgitated articles from the internet with an additional spin on top to get clicks. At the end of the day its just about creating clicks.

1st gear: it would be better if you talked with an ICE emissions expert instead of quoting the guardian. The guardian has an agenda, and clearly knows little to nothing about NOx emissions.

And nothing of value was lost that fucking day.

As dumb as I think it is to have a blanket ban on just a few cars that includes versions incapable of doing burnouts, but also not include rebadged cars under a different name, I’m not sure of a better action to take.

Sigh... Houston C&C used to be a mile from my house. While the organizers tend to be a bit supercar elitist, at least they tried to run a tight ship by hiring off-duty cops and putting up “no burnout signs”. Of course, no matter where they stationed the off-duty cops, the burnout crowd would go 50 feet past and do

Just wait till they’re like $6-10k. Highschool parking lots at the end of the school day are gonna be deathtraps.

I maintain that the modern Charger/Challenger, Camaro, and Mustang have been the worst things to ever happen to the car hobby. Poorly-built cars with insane horsepower and no way to harness it properly and available for relatively little money. It was never going to end well. 

I bet it’s pretty much the opposite of that. It might go the way of the Model S/X, where sales hold great until the market gets saturated. The draw of this isn’t that it’s a truck (so it probably won’t pull in a lot of F-150 buyers), but that it’s ridiculously quirky and futuristic, the way people 30 years ago

Likely just an early pre-production prototype that they wrapped for fun. If you look at some of the other Cybertrucks that have been spotted in public lately, all of these fitment issues seem to be fixed. For example look at the tailgate alignment of this Cybertruck spotted on a trail: