"Oh no, not the star of A Most Violent Year!"

He's a good comedian, but he really comes off like he can't handle not being the center of a bit or comedic piece. Like, as soon as something starts to go off into a different direction than he might like he has to jump in and make sure everyone gets his reaction. He's no Jeff Garlin when it comes to that sort of…

Of course Adam Pally has a buddy named Doug.

He was the Michael Scott of the Office writers' room.

Don't worry, she'll get justice in 30 years when he's no longer a kingmaker. Ain't entertainment grand?

Even worse, she was a woman who liked sex!

Completely disagree. I think the first season is as close to a perfect season of television as there can be and that the following seasons, while still mostly great, all had a bum story line or stretch of aimlessness that prevented them from matching it.

It doesn't help that as soon as that episode ended everyone was acting like they totally knew where Sansa's arc was going and wrote off the rest of the season based on what they thought was going to happen. I didn't hear a lot of retractions when that character spent the rest of the season fighting back as much as a…

I disagree. Mad Men's last half-season had some great moments, but it definitely got pretty aimless at points. And more characters than I would have liked (Roger, Ted, to name a couple) didn't get wrapped up nearly as satisfactorily as I would have liked.

Boo.

They're telling human stories in a fantasy world!

Yeah, the lows were low but the highs were as good as they have ever been.

I am totally okay with this.

What if it was him? What if, what if he was in that movie? Huh huh huh huh

I hope we get the rasta accent.

I mean Mad Men could honestly get funny enough that it could have been nominated as a comedy.

YEAH BABY!

If I can't trust the AV Club comment section who can I trust?

Oh. My bad then.

Yeah. Love the Dink but I agree.