That’s not hard to explain at all. It comes down to one taped show a week vs. 2 live shows.

Boy, do I have some bad news about New Japan and women.

Half the problem with the booking of talent is there is far too much talent in WWE since they are trying to keep the best talent away from other organizations. When you have 200+ wrestlers under contract, it’s almost impossible for them to be featured at all nor to not repeat storyline/types multiple times in even a…

surely it’d be more productive than commenting on an article you don’t care about instead of skipping it

So the question is whether I’d rather get the crap beaten out of me by 100 bearded dwarves or one beautiful Amazon goddess?

I feel like the latter option probably has one or more Tumblr pages dedicated to it.

Alternately, you could fight 100 Finn Balors or one Nia Jax, I guess.

Yes

If you had to fight 100 Sasha Banks-sized Luke Harpers or one Luke Harper-sized Sasha Banks, which would you choose?

Like most “reality TV” it’s scripted, and pretty much started that trend.

Leading the show with Rollins squashing Lesnar was tremendous, I thought. Giving the fans a good lead-in to set the table seemed like a great call, but the show being 7 hours long killed any, and all, momentum past hour 3.

Kofi’s win was so feel good it was crazy.

The only way the rollup seems legit, is the idea that Ronda progresses the story with the mindset that, “Becky didn’t actually beat me, she got lucky.”

You’re gonna hurt people's feelings

Three good things from last night:

Yes, but sometimes things happen in a live event in front of 70000 people.