My local corner store used to let us get essentials (beer, cigs, milk) when we were short on cash. They’d just have a running tab that we never saw them write down, but was always accurate.

I’m such a fan of long form writing that I almost bought a notebook that can be reused by MICROWAVING the paper.

The primary complaint isn’t about convenience; it’s about removing human elements that forge connections, which can be very beneficial in times of celebration and sorow.

Get. Over. It.

He works in tech, notorious iceboxes.

Yo Mama’s a snowflake.

How about you get some reading comprehension and shut the fuck about her personal choice? She was asked what is the laziest thing SHE has ever done, not that C-sections are lazy.

Yep, vanity, convenience. Glad someone gets it.

I thought she meant that she was one of those women who scheduled C-sections to avoid pain, poop, labor. That was a very common—and practice around the time she had her kid.

That’s who she looks like!

Yeah, that’s how it was before we as a society decided it was okay to psychically and physically exhaust children for the sake of entertainment. Adults played the roles of teenagers. I won’t direct you to the show Grease.

I bought the same wireless charging dock because my cords were constsntly fraying. It’s now in a drawer somewhere. It really wasn’t all that much of a saver.

Absolutely a feeler.

I love when real talk is accompanied by research. Give it to ‘em, Ms. Butler.

It’s definitely a generational tic. On one hand, women were not working outside the home, so it was a feat for a woman to do something outside of assembly line work. Also, knowing how much work motherhood entailed, given that dad’s were notoriously hands-off, made the feat all the more a marvel.

Part of this isn’t surprising right? I mean, women, not men, host, birth, and nurse children. Could and should women be considered for roles that have fuckall to do with motherhood? Absolutely. Is it surprising that parenthood is depicted more often with women than with men? No.

Surely the cop is being a criminal. Ironically, he tells the videographer that a court will determine whether he’s acting illegally, yet, that’s how he should have approached the vendor. The court will determine whether the vendor owes restitution, not the cop. This is outrageous.

Funny, there’s another, recent photo of her in which she looks legitimately flawless.

He said the only word that would matter to a court. I blame you and your ilk for much of the dreck we deal with today.

He discussed it. What do people want to happen? No one has brought any charges, or outright accused him by name, even, yet he’s supposed to say, “No, it isn’t me, but please let’s continue to tall about it, speculatively.”