Honestly, that might even be *worse*. Just going through all that effort and not even getting laid?
Honestly, that might even be *worse*. Just going through all that effort and not even getting laid?
I mean, at this point Disney is more MCU + Star Wars than old school toons. They're not exactly hurting for IP.
And I’m saying that maybe doing things professionally is actually a good thing. And that perhaps this collective folk mythology we’ve about the plucky upstart triumphing against the odds to show up the so-called experts is mostly bullshit.
But the funny thing is, there is actually a good reason why people don’t take multimillion dollar risks based on the idea of “some guy”.
Apparently started as a Janitor in 1976 and was promoted to apprentist machinist in 1977.
No, they were *always* this averse to facts. It’s why the phrase is “based on a true story” and not just “this is a true story”.
I believe that’s the implied theory here. That somehow the plane sprung a leak or otherwise lost cabin pressure.
Not having smog in major cities is a boon for “the environment”. Lower greenhouse gas emissions is also a benefit.
Wait, if we’re fighting Merryweather, can we still call in their services? I mean, not being able to get that cheap heli ride would suck.
I’ll admit, I’d watch a show about John Mulaney doing coke, having affairs, and generally fucking up his life.
“New Idol track introduces Madonna to Playboy Carti” seems like a perfectly OK headline.
It means “to introduce X, or the works of X, to someone”.
Or just don’t.
Jesus man, just admit you're old. "Put someone on to X" is like a decade old slang.
It makes more sense in context in the linked article.
Heh. I remember a coworker recommended it. After I watched it, I realized that I really shouldn’t take his recommendations on comedy any more.
Star Citizen actually released and is playable though...
Nah.
Lol, at $15,000 grand a year, you can just pay for a real assistant. Especially in China.
Y'all remember the good old days of whitehouse.com?