snakeplissken
snakeplissken
snakeplissken

...and from the Renaissance period...

Here are some oldies- but goodies— who believed in creation—-

Ok— for simplicity— this is just a list of folks with doctorates, alive today...this is BY NO MEANS — an exhaustive list— but, just your average everyday scientist who likely has an education far surpassing Gawker media poster “christco”, my buddy.

Ok— from which period of scientific discovery would you prefer? I would like to prepare a list for you that is both timely, while yet exhaustive enough to meet your fancy.

Could the ark float? Here is a link that counters your “most damning” evidence —which contradicts ‘John Rockwell’—:

world wide stories of an Ark, and a Flood are there because it happened—worldwide— and ALL people groups knew and understood the event and what happened— esp since the boat itself contained the last vestiges of humanity that repopulated the world in the aftermath...

It has been found— but under a glacier and is in a territory where Turks and warfare between competing people groups have made it impossible to gain access long enough for a complete analysis, sampling and mapping etc.

funny— but nothing close to reality— many of the worlds most accomplished scientists are/were creationists in their lifetimes... each possessing a higher IQ than gawker poster “fangbanger”...

LMAO.. as you comment at Gawker... Pot, meet kettle.

lots of business applications for usable, interactive maps...

Can you send me the links to those meta-studies? the one I found was a “leaked analysis” that was reported by RT in 2013 about the GMO corn vs Non-GMO corn comparison... it wasnt pretty— but your studies would be of interest to me.

..oh and GMO corn, for example, has MUCH less nutrient content than non-GMO corn...Phosphate, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium...

The edible, non toxic nature of blueberries has been tested— with humans for many thousands of years— and together with myriad other foods. (and we KNOW when it is toxic... see also ‘Violet’, from “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory”) The burden of proof as far as safety and testing goes relates to new-fangled,

yet another solution... the possibilities are endless.

Yes, this is great when studying one specific thing, the proteins it produces, and then how they are expelled. You find out the max load a creature can handle before serious consequences (cancer/death/etc)— then dial it back and then list what the safe level is. got it. however, what must ALSO be done is to test it

There will be a market for sex cabs... dark tint. known transit times— spacious padded interiors—an upgrade on the current limo with a divider.

Sounds like what you want is a stable enough corn to be ‘Round-up ready’ and survive under a bath of patented insecticide that will work in tandem with the GM genes in your corn to “fight-off” disease/insects... then, be ready for harvest as fat as possible... So no cause for alarm about the glyphosate you are

“Have been proven safe” and “have not been proven unsafe” are 2 entirely different concepts... esp as it relates to millions of people ingesting the fruits of this for years

WTF? Tomatos and Cockroaches can/could NEVER cross breed— that is, until GM tech came along... You are uninformed.

Its’ inefficiencies will be simply fixed by Vehicle-to-tracker communication... much like your car senses other passengers and will turn on, or turn off the airbags in the empty seats— that info will simply be sent to these tracers that are positioned over the HOV lanes— OR, the car simply wont go in the HOV lane in