smrknd2
smrknd2
smrknd2

staph infection

It definitely doesn’t seem like my cup of tea, but losing a child is something so awful that I can’t bring myself to judge anything that might bring comfort.

It’s simple, really.

1/2 situations in which Men use the toilet require the seat to be down (unless you shit standing up, which...is just impressive)

2/2 situations in which Women use the toilet require the seat to be down.

Therefore 3/4 times the toilet seat needs to be down.


edit: holy fuck people I’m not saying Men

Why risk losing the “damn bitch had it coming” vote? That is at least half of his base, anyways.

Dear GOP women,

Because we’ve been fed the ‘all taxation is theft’ line for decades and lots of people believe it...people don’t lose elections by promising to lower taxes. Also mismanagement. Basically those two things.

I actually consider what Trump said to be way more intellectually honest than the party-line bullshit about women being victims of abortion-pushing MDs. That’s what he’s doing, he’s laying their bullshit bare for all to see by taking it all to the logical conclusions.

Right, the late night booty call, on an actual telephone.

I mean, Lauren. What a guy had to do 20 years ago to get a woman in bed?

That’s literally her point.

With a conservative majority, the Supreme Court gave us the shit sandwich known as Citizens United and gutted the Civil Rights Voting Act. With a liberal majority, it would protect reproductive rights, LGBT rights and the ACA. It would even overturn crap like Citizens United. We need a

Uh, yeah, that’s the fucking point...

Right? Clinton and Sanders voted together 93% of the time they were both in the Senate:

One million stars to you!
I keep commenting all over the damn place that politics is compromise and as a Sanders supporter I view Clinton as a fine compromise. Their platforms are nearly identical. Where they differ, her position is still better than Trump’s. She has experience up the wazoo and is hella politically

It’s hardly a gamble. No, Garland is not the progressive WOC I’d prefer. He’s more like another Breyer, who, on most accounts, has been very reliable for a liberal leaning interpretation of the Constitution.

It isn’t fear mongering. It is reality. If the past 6 years have showed you anything, it’s that SCOTUS is really the last branch left in the federal government that can cause real change. Congress has become a children’s day care center where a “good day” is one where nobody picks a fight with someone else such that

Obama didn’t blow anything up. He tested the waters. It was a politically savvy move to show that the Republicans are just tantruming and it’s working fine so far. Now, they could call his bluff and pass the nominee along but I think they’re going to wait to see how the primaries turn out and how the poll numbers

People who want to make sure they have an ideologically pure voting record at the expense of real people getting hurt by letting a Republican win really make my heart hurt.

Then have fun with another generation of a conservative SCOTUS.

Since Sarandon isn’t going to suffer the most consequences under the Trump presidency, or for that matter under any general breakdown of society, I would kindly request that she not opine about revolutions here. (Also, as bad as Trump would be, I don’t see “revolution” really being a possibility here. Protests? Sure.

This is such a wildly privileged opinion. Real people will get hurt under Trump. SCOTUS will be changed. Laws will be passed. The military will be deployed, affecting people around the globe. I get that you want a different political system but this is the one we live in. Don’t throw others under the bus in your quest