“Before the De La Hoya fight, HBO debuted 24/7, a three week look into the fighter’s lives before the actual fight. On the very first episode, Mayweather noted that no one wants to pay to watch two good guys fight, so fuck it, “I’ll be the bad guy.” Thus, the Money Mayweather persona was born.” 

Didn’t we learn anything from Juju Pepe?

When Trump sent his tweets trashing Mika & Joe, the thing I found most offensive (it was all inherently gross and petty) was that Mika was in mourning, having just lost her father - a lifelong American statesman - 2 weeks earlier. This was rarely discussed, but a perfect example of how ruthless Trump is, without any…

ignore the flesh egg in the background and zoom in on them sweet pinstripes

White’s there to prove to bros everywhere that, if they really try and find a perfect niche, they can carve out a nice career making money off the brotastic lifestyle.

I think the bigger deal is the email specifically talks about Don Sr.’s schedule and his personal assistant. This basically opens his entire schedule and Rolodex to subpoena by Mueller, that is a huge deal. I’d look for an office fire in Trump tower soon.

1) You’re talking about the difference in estimated costs vs. actual. A problem in and of itself, to be sure. Certainly the final balance depends on the costs, but the difference in what they estimated isn’t particularly relevant. What matters is actual costs vs. actual revenue.

I’m sure they feel, much like me, that your idiocy deserves to be pointed out.

Take solace in the fact that Russian Conspiracy Twitter is claiming that there is much worse stuff about to be let out. Jr. is trying to get out ahead of that news, not this meeting, and I suspect they’re hoping that his downfall will make the general public less willing to bring the hammer down on the rest of them…

Is there a club for BTLC burner accounts? Asking for a friend with green eyes...

You must not know, London 2012 went massively over-budget for not having the STADIUMS either. All of the examples of cost overruns are in places that had to build either new stadiums, new infrastructure, or both. This is the argument the previously-linked article makes; it never accounts for somewhere that don’t…

name one city that hosted the Olympics that was able to do so without any additional infrastructure spending.

Sipowitz, when confronted with the facts I pointed to in support of you, chose the dismiss button. So apologies for responding to you here, but I figure I should at least give everyone a chance to read the thread of his wrongness, if they choose.

No.

I see someone else has already mentioned it, but the countries for whom the Olympics is a huge financial fiasco are smaller/poorer countries who have to actively build up the infrastructure needed to host the games and then have no use for it afterwards.

... and I read the article a second time just to make sure.

Thank you. Your article completely supports my comment.

Did you read PotkChopExpressionism’s comment? Or the article you responded with?

Wait, he’s still publicly commenting on this? Like, after a weekend of fucking himself in the ass with his own mouth, he still thinks it’s a good idea to say anything at all about this story?